one of the aspects of an active lifestyle that people come to realize is the invariable state of being outside. almost everything calls one forth to experience the elements, particularly as the distances increase and the time allotted expands. swimming, biking, running, walking requires at least some portion of our activities be spent outdoors.
not that anyone minds. if anything, it's what drives us to adopt the lifestyle to begin with. because we believe that it provides us benefits that we all too often lack in sedentary living.
to a degree, the benefits are physical and mental: we reacquaint ourselves with our senses, smelling tasting feeling seeing the elements of all that is around us through a range far beyond that which we experience cowering in a room; we feel the coursing of our bodies in muscle, bone, and sinew activated by blood and nerves powered by heart and lungs instigated by the recesses in the corners of our minds; and we experience and we respond and we learn and we know far more than the hidden places from where we always begin. and in so doing we come to know what it feels to be alive.
which is why, beyond a certain point, the benefits become something more. the change of pace and space and time and state allows our spirits to stretch and bend and extend and grow, free to move and flex and flow past the stiffening confines of our normal lives; the venturing towards the unlimited and the exploration into the unknown draws us to vast perspectives that reach unbound beyond the barriers of our comfort zones; and we thereby take in broad spectrum the deep significance of a great world outside ourselves. and in so doing we come to understand what it is to be alive.
it's here i find Plato's allegory of the cave apropos. the allegory, in short, begins with a description of people who've resided their entire lives inside a cave, bound and fixed so that their only perceptions of reality are the shadows that they see on the wall. the allegory asks what happens to the dwellers of the cave when they are told by outsiders of the world that lies beyond shadows, and asks further what happens when the dwellers are suddenly freed and allowed to leave the cave. the experience of stepping outside the cave, of facing the world, of discovering more than shadows and walls and overhangs and chains but instead colors and horizons and skies and liberation. it's all more than they ever knew, more than they ever expected, more than they ever were.
in such a situation, do the dwellers of the cave go forth? do they leave the comfort of the known and familiar and stay what was? or do they step forward into the glory of the unknown and unfamiliar and become what is to be?
and i think this is what really, deep down, inside anyone who adopts an active lifestyle, is really going on. we're leaving the cave. we're breaking the chains that bind us, looking past the shadows before us, and turning to face all the universe that extends beyond us. and every one of us who rises from our rooms and opens the door and goes on through is taking the act of placing ourselves outside our comfort zones and giving ourselves the gift of liberation so that we may grow as far and as high and as deep and as significant and as profound and as great as the life of the cosmos around us, so that we become the mystery that is creation...and the mystery of creation is life.
and all we do is step outside the cave.
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Sunday, April 22, 2012
earth day 2012
oh phooey. i almost forgot to make my annual post in contribution to Earth Day. i'll put this up, albeit it won't match my posts for previous commemorations.
you can see my usual posts on Earth Day in the past: Earth Day 2011. i've written posts every year since 2007, but you can use the links from there.
i won't say much this year, other than remind everyone that given the amount of time endurance athletes spend outdoors (swimming pools, lakes, shorelines, rivers, streams, alleys, streets, highways, paths, trails, roads, etc., etc., etc.), we all hold a healthy respect for the world around us and should aspire to make it as good an environment as we possibly can.
to that end, this year's theme for Earth Day 2012 is Mobilize the Earth, and calls upon everyone to mobilize awareness and action to help improve the environment. this includes doing something--even if just 1 thing, no matter how small--to express some care for the planet. for more information regarding today's events, you can reference:
cheers.
you can see my usual posts on Earth Day in the past: Earth Day 2011. i've written posts every year since 2007, but you can use the links from there.
i won't say much this year, other than remind everyone that given the amount of time endurance athletes spend outdoors (swimming pools, lakes, shorelines, rivers, streams, alleys, streets, highways, paths, trails, roads, etc., etc., etc.), we all hold a healthy respect for the world around us and should aspire to make it as good an environment as we possibly can.
to that end, this year's theme for Earth Day 2012 is Mobilize the Earth, and calls upon everyone to mobilize awareness and action to help improve the environment. this includes doing something--even if just 1 thing, no matter how small--to express some care for the planet. for more information regarding today's events, you can reference:
- Earth Day: http://www.earthday.org/
- Earth Day 2012: Mobilize the Earth: http://www.earthday.org/2012
- A Billion Acts of Green: http://act.earthday.org/
- Athletes and Arts for the Earth: http://www.earthday.org/athletes-and-arts-for-the-earth
cheers.
Labels:
media,
observations
Monday, April 16, 2012
boston marathon 2012: race organizers with a conscience
i was following the news of this year's Boston Marathon 2012 and felt motivated to write up a post about something that struck me about the race. it wasn't the extreme conditions of the race, but rather how the race organizers responded to it.
the conditions, based on news reports, were brutal. apparently, race day fulfilled forecasts, with temperatures rising to 88-89 degrees F. factoring in the lack of clouds and bright sunlight, this drove on-course temperatures close to 100 degrees F, with the asphalt working to absorb sunlight and become a radiative source of heat (much the same way on-field temperatures for a football/soccer/baseball game are always higher than in the spectator stands). it was bad enough that even the professionals were affected, with winning times well off the times from last year even though this is an Olympic year that has been marked with athletes running exceptionally fast in other venues prior to this one.
i've done races under those conditions, and they're not fun. i have total sympathy for everyone--athletes, support staff, and spectators--involved, and my respect goes to them all. you can get a feel for the conditions from the following selection of articles:
you can get an idea of how the operators of the Boston Marathon dealt with the forecast course conditions from the following (i've included the text of the last one at the end of this post):
these actions may seem common sense and obvious to some, but i and many others can tell you from personal experience that they're not. i've undergone some less-than-memorable and outright dangerous situations at a number of races that i shall not name (not out of courtesy, but because of utter disgust).
specifically, i've had running and triathlon races that did none of the above things--races involving even more extreme conditions (race day temperatures above 100 degrees F, or desert sandstorms, or arctic storms from Alaska) where the race organizers continued to hold the races with no alerts or announcements to competitors, staff, or spectators; maintained the same cut-off times; did not provide additional fluids or volunteers (there have been 2 races where the aid stations actually ran out of fluids and volunteers left--that was the one where temps were >100 degrees F, and it was in the desert...you know who you are); did not adjust medical aid (one race in particular in a winter storm with drenching rain and high winds with a finish-line medical tent that was a canopy with no walls and the doctors just told competitors that there were no blankets or heat and that there was nothing they could do--in the end all they did was call 911 as competitors began showing up with hypothermia...again, you know who you are).
and of course, the ultimate indignity and insult was that almost every race i've been in has refused to allow deferments, even though they knew in advance that there would be extreme course conditions. based on some of the race reports i've read, this particular issue seems to be a chronic feature of Ironman races. one report i read said that a particular Ironman at a particular Western U.S. state actually issued a dare, and told him and other competitors that if they had qualms about a forecast of a winter storm warning of snow, ice, and wind (!!!) on race day and requested a deferment that they didn't deserve to be Ironman competitors and that it was their own fault they couldn't deal with a winter storm.
to me, this particular kind of attitude is dangerous. i remind everyone of just how far this attitude can go: Ironman Utah, where 1 person actually died.
i find this type of attitude highly problematic for several reasons: 1) it's an insult to people who've committed themselves to change their lives and gone through the training that it entails; 2) it operates as an exclusionary device when the purpose of sport should be inclusionary; 3) it's arrogant and obnoxious; 4) makes sports about life-and-death, when it's supposed to be about achievement and personal fulfillment (people sign up to race for the latter, not the former...seriously: war is life-and-death, but sport is not war); and 5) to anyone with any level of street-smarts, this really sounds like a diversionary tactic to disguise an effort to keep race monies and not have to worry about competitors--in other words: steal people's money.
i can understand that races involve a lot of intensive preparation and organization, and that race organizers in exchange need to ensure that competitors provide the same level of commitment that is being put into holding a race. but it seems like there's a few race organizers at some events who are taking advantage of this to prejudice things towards some unethical ends. they seem to think having people fill out liability waivers absolves them of any sense of right and wrong or concepts of negligence and diligence.
in contrast, the folks at the Boston Marathon seem to be doing things with some sense of fairness and decency. and they're proving it's possible to provide competitors some allowances to deal with extreme conditions. i, for one, am a HUGE fan of the idea of a deferment (as well as aid stations that actually provide aid).
it's laudable for them to have--and follow--a conscience. and i want to provide this post to direct credit to them for it...and to direct other race organizers to do something similar with their own events.
Hot Temps Force Boston Marathoners to Take It Slow
Boston (AP) - There are races to run fast, and there are races just to finish. With temperatures hitting the 80s, Monday's Boston Marathon was the latter.
Nearly 22,500 participants braved unseasonably balmy conditions at the 116th running of the storied 26.2 mile race. Organizers stocked extra water and pleaded with runners to slow their pace to avoid heat stroke. Some 4,300 participants registered to run opted to sit out.
"It was brutal, just brutally hot,'' said 38-year-old runner Jason Warick of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, who took an ice bath before the race to cool his body. "Around 15 miles the wheels just came off. Then it was just about getting home.''
Organizers said that as of Monday evening, just under 2,000 participants had received some level of medical attention, and about 120 were taken to hospitals in ambulances. One person was taken from the course in serious condition in Wellesley, though the details of their condition were unavailable Monday.
Medical volunteers scanned the finish line for runners displaying signs of heat stroke, assisting those in need to nearby medical tents. By mid-afternoon, dozens of wheelchairs carrying pale and weakened runners stretched outside the tents.
"I've never seen anything like (that),'' said 35-year-old Desiree Ficker of Austin, Texas, who used salt supplements during the race to stay moving. "It was really hard seeing the confusion on people's faces.''
Organizers said careful preparation and responsible runners prevented more serious problems on what was one of the hottest marathons in Boston history.
Heat was also a problem in the 2004 marathon, when 2,041 of the 18,002 participants who started the race sought medical attention. That's a higher percentage than any year in memory, according to organizers.
"This was the day we were preparing for,'' said Thomas Grilk, executive director of the Boston Athletic Association. "The god of marathoning, she smiled on us.''
Temperatures prompted 30 additional physicians to volunteer at the last minute. Race organizers and volunteers pleaded with runners to put their safety ahead of their competitive drive.
"Today is not the day to run a personal best,'' said Garth Savidge, rehab supervisor at Newton-Wellesley Hospital, who was helping runners before the race. "Everybody is being a little extra cautious.''
Organizers said the highest temperature recorded Monday during the marathon was 89 degrees in Framingham at 12:30 p.m.
Registered runners who decided not to run because of the heat will be given an opportunity to run in next year's race.
Susie Eisenberg-Argo said she never considered skipping her ninth consecutive Boston Marathon. The 50-year-old Sugarland, Texas resident said before the marathon that she would force herself to slow down instead - and make sure she stopped for water along the way.
"It's a challenge to back off and say, `I'm just going to take it a little more slowly,''' she said. "Most of the people here know what they're doing.''
Matt Manning finished the race in 2 hours and 34 minutes - a full 10 minutes slower than his pace last year. He said the heat set in after the first several miles.
"It was direct sun the whole way,'' said the 32-year-old Baton Rouge, La., man. "I was hanging around through 10K or so, then I started to slow down.... I may move to Alaska or something to get away from the heat.''
The famously welcoming crowds that line up to watch the marathon did their best to help out the athletes, cheering them on even as they themselves sweated through an unseasonably warm April day.
June Ramlett, 83, has been watching the marathon since she was a little girl. The Hopkinton, Mass. woman made sure to have a good vantage point for the starting line. She drank from a plastic jug of water to stay cool.
"It's really something to see,'' Ramlett said as thousands of runners hit their stride. "I've watching it for years and it's still very special.''
the conditions, based on news reports, were brutal. apparently, race day fulfilled forecasts, with temperatures rising to 88-89 degrees F. factoring in the lack of clouds and bright sunlight, this drove on-course temperatures close to 100 degrees F, with the asphalt working to absorb sunlight and become a radiative source of heat (much the same way on-field temperatures for a football/soccer/baseball game are always higher than in the spectator stands). it was bad enough that even the professionals were affected, with winning times well off the times from last year even though this is an Olympic year that has been marked with athletes running exceptionally fast in other venues prior to this one.
i've done races under those conditions, and they're not fun. i have total sympathy for everyone--athletes, support staff, and spectators--involved, and my respect goes to them all. you can get a feel for the conditions from the following selection of articles:
- Science of Sport: http://www.sportsscientists.com/2012/04/boston-strikes-back-boston-2012.html
- Yahoo! News: http://news.yahoo.com/heat-forces-boston-marathon-runners-adjust-201522512--spt.html
- Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/16/us-usa-marathon-boston-idUSBRE83F0NR20120416
you can get an idea of how the operators of the Boston Marathon dealt with the forecast course conditions from the following (i've included the text of the last one at the end of this post):
- Boston Globe: http://bostonglobe.com/sports/specials/boston-marathon/2012/04/16/marathon-medical-staff-brace-for-hot-busy-day/JEi7zoRI7ENzNuDUaxK4QM/story.html
- Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/early-lead/post/boston-marathon-2012-race-officials-warn-runners-that-heat-is-forecast/2012/04/16/gIQABdLHLT_blog.html
- Sports Illustrated: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/track_field/wires/04/16/2080.ap.ath.boston.marathon.heat.7th.ld.writethru.0857/index.html
- race organizers advised competitors, staff, and spectators about the expected extreme conditions, with recommendations on what to do and what options were available to cope
- race organizers extended the cut-off time of the race by 1 hour to allow competitors to run at a safer pace
- race organizers ensured there was extra fluids and race volunteers at all aid stations
- race organizers increased the number of prepared medical staff and medical equipment available, both on the course and at area hospitals and clinics
- race organizers provided competitors the opportunity to defer from this year's race to next year
these actions may seem common sense and obvious to some, but i and many others can tell you from personal experience that they're not. i've undergone some less-than-memorable and outright dangerous situations at a number of races that i shall not name (not out of courtesy, but because of utter disgust).
specifically, i've had running and triathlon races that did none of the above things--races involving even more extreme conditions (race day temperatures above 100 degrees F, or desert sandstorms, or arctic storms from Alaska) where the race organizers continued to hold the races with no alerts or announcements to competitors, staff, or spectators; maintained the same cut-off times; did not provide additional fluids or volunteers (there have been 2 races where the aid stations actually ran out of fluids and volunteers left--that was the one where temps were >100 degrees F, and it was in the desert...you know who you are); did not adjust medical aid (one race in particular in a winter storm with drenching rain and high winds with a finish-line medical tent that was a canopy with no walls and the doctors just told competitors that there were no blankets or heat and that there was nothing they could do--in the end all they did was call 911 as competitors began showing up with hypothermia...again, you know who you are).
and of course, the ultimate indignity and insult was that almost every race i've been in has refused to allow deferments, even though they knew in advance that there would be extreme course conditions. based on some of the race reports i've read, this particular issue seems to be a chronic feature of Ironman races. one report i read said that a particular Ironman at a particular Western U.S. state actually issued a dare, and told him and other competitors that if they had qualms about a forecast of a winter storm warning of snow, ice, and wind (!!!) on race day and requested a deferment that they didn't deserve to be Ironman competitors and that it was their own fault they couldn't deal with a winter storm.
to me, this particular kind of attitude is dangerous. i remind everyone of just how far this attitude can go: Ironman Utah, where 1 person actually died.
i find this type of attitude highly problematic for several reasons: 1) it's an insult to people who've committed themselves to change their lives and gone through the training that it entails; 2) it operates as an exclusionary device when the purpose of sport should be inclusionary; 3) it's arrogant and obnoxious; 4) makes sports about life-and-death, when it's supposed to be about achievement and personal fulfillment (people sign up to race for the latter, not the former...seriously: war is life-and-death, but sport is not war); and 5) to anyone with any level of street-smarts, this really sounds like a diversionary tactic to disguise an effort to keep race monies and not have to worry about competitors--in other words: steal people's money.
i can understand that races involve a lot of intensive preparation and organization, and that race organizers in exchange need to ensure that competitors provide the same level of commitment that is being put into holding a race. but it seems like there's a few race organizers at some events who are taking advantage of this to prejudice things towards some unethical ends. they seem to think having people fill out liability waivers absolves them of any sense of right and wrong or concepts of negligence and diligence.
in contrast, the folks at the Boston Marathon seem to be doing things with some sense of fairness and decency. and they're proving it's possible to provide competitors some allowances to deal with extreme conditions. i, for one, am a HUGE fan of the idea of a deferment (as well as aid stations that actually provide aid).
it's laudable for them to have--and follow--a conscience. and i want to provide this post to direct credit to them for it...and to direct other race organizers to do something similar with their own events.
Hot Temps Force Boston Marathoners to Take It Slow
Boston (AP) - There are races to run fast, and there are races just to finish. With temperatures hitting the 80s, Monday's Boston Marathon was the latter.
Nearly 22,500 participants braved unseasonably balmy conditions at the 116th running of the storied 26.2 mile race. Organizers stocked extra water and pleaded with runners to slow their pace to avoid heat stroke. Some 4,300 participants registered to run opted to sit out.
"It was brutal, just brutally hot,'' said 38-year-old runner Jason Warick of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, who took an ice bath before the race to cool his body. "Around 15 miles the wheels just came off. Then it was just about getting home.''
Organizers said that as of Monday evening, just under 2,000 participants had received some level of medical attention, and about 120 were taken to hospitals in ambulances. One person was taken from the course in serious condition in Wellesley, though the details of their condition were unavailable Monday.
Medical volunteers scanned the finish line for runners displaying signs of heat stroke, assisting those in need to nearby medical tents. By mid-afternoon, dozens of wheelchairs carrying pale and weakened runners stretched outside the tents.
"I've never seen anything like (that),'' said 35-year-old Desiree Ficker of Austin, Texas, who used salt supplements during the race to stay moving. "It was really hard seeing the confusion on people's faces.''
Organizers said careful preparation and responsible runners prevented more serious problems on what was one of the hottest marathons in Boston history.
Heat was also a problem in the 2004 marathon, when 2,041 of the 18,002 participants who started the race sought medical attention. That's a higher percentage than any year in memory, according to organizers.
"This was the day we were preparing for,'' said Thomas Grilk, executive director of the Boston Athletic Association. "The god of marathoning, she smiled on us.''
Temperatures prompted 30 additional physicians to volunteer at the last minute. Race organizers and volunteers pleaded with runners to put their safety ahead of their competitive drive.
"Today is not the day to run a personal best,'' said Garth Savidge, rehab supervisor at Newton-Wellesley Hospital, who was helping runners before the race. "Everybody is being a little extra cautious.''
Organizers said the highest temperature recorded Monday during the marathon was 89 degrees in Framingham at 12:30 p.m.
Registered runners who decided not to run because of the heat will be given an opportunity to run in next year's race.
Susie Eisenberg-Argo said she never considered skipping her ninth consecutive Boston Marathon. The 50-year-old Sugarland, Texas resident said before the marathon that she would force herself to slow down instead - and make sure she stopped for water along the way.
"It's a challenge to back off and say, `I'm just going to take it a little more slowly,''' she said. "Most of the people here know what they're doing.''
Matt Manning finished the race in 2 hours and 34 minutes - a full 10 minutes slower than his pace last year. He said the heat set in after the first several miles.
"It was direct sun the whole way,'' said the 32-year-old Baton Rouge, La., man. "I was hanging around through 10K or so, then I started to slow down.... I may move to Alaska or something to get away from the heat.''
The famously welcoming crowds that line up to watch the marathon did their best to help out the athletes, cheering them on even as they themselves sweated through an unseasonably warm April day.
June Ramlett, 83, has been watching the marathon since she was a little girl. The Hopkinton, Mass. woman made sure to have a good vantage point for the starting line. She drank from a plastic jug of water to stay cool.
"It's really something to see,'' Ramlett said as thousands of runners hit their stride. "I've watching it for years and it's still very special.''
Labels:
media,
observations
Saturday, March 31, 2012
earth hour 2012
it's that time of year again: earth hour 2012.
as part of the social-conscious (or conscience) portion of this blog, i make it a point to promote and engage causes that i think deserve support. one of them is the annual earth hour event.
earth hour began in Australia in 2007 as a positive way of raising awareness for climate change in a way that involved hope as opposed to fear. it involves everyone turning off all power for 1 hour at the same time on the same day of the year as a way of thinking about how to reduce consumption of energy, with the ostensible message of trying to reduce carbon footprint but with an ulterior message of being mindful about the environment. since 2007, the event has spread around the world, and in 2011 encompassed 5,200 cities in 135 countries.
for earth hour 2012, the selected hour is 8:30-9:30pm, and the selected day is Saturday, March 31st. obviously, this means that earth hour will vary by timezone--in fact, as i write this, people on the other side of the international date line will already be finishing the day. but the idea is to create what an observer in space would see as a rolling hour of consciousness coinciding with the rotation of the earth.
of course, most Americans don't know about this event, since only a handful of cities in the U.S. observed the event. which is the reason why i'm taking some time to promote it in this blog. i'm hoping more American cities, and more Americans, take some note of this...it's becoming embarrassing to see the rest of the world exercise a conscience as we seem to insist on thuggishness.
you can learn more about earth hour at the organization's website: http://www.earthhour.org/
there's also a promotional video of earth hour 2012 that i think is very well done:
http://youtu.be/FovYv8vf5_E
you can read my posts from earth hour of the past few years:
as part of the social-conscious (or conscience) portion of this blog, i make it a point to promote and engage causes that i think deserve support. one of them is the annual earth hour event.
earth hour began in Australia in 2007 as a positive way of raising awareness for climate change in a way that involved hope as opposed to fear. it involves everyone turning off all power for 1 hour at the same time on the same day of the year as a way of thinking about how to reduce consumption of energy, with the ostensible message of trying to reduce carbon footprint but with an ulterior message of being mindful about the environment. since 2007, the event has spread around the world, and in 2011 encompassed 5,200 cities in 135 countries.
for earth hour 2012, the selected hour is 8:30-9:30pm, and the selected day is Saturday, March 31st. obviously, this means that earth hour will vary by timezone--in fact, as i write this, people on the other side of the international date line will already be finishing the day. but the idea is to create what an observer in space would see as a rolling hour of consciousness coinciding with the rotation of the earth.
of course, most Americans don't know about this event, since only a handful of cities in the U.S. observed the event. which is the reason why i'm taking some time to promote it in this blog. i'm hoping more American cities, and more Americans, take some note of this...it's becoming embarrassing to see the rest of the world exercise a conscience as we seem to insist on thuggishness.
you can learn more about earth hour at the organization's website: http://www.earthhour.org/
there's also a promotional video of earth hour 2012 that i think is very well done:
http://youtu.be/FovYv8vf5_E
you can read my posts from earth hour of the past few years:
- earth hour 2011: http://jonathaninthedistance.blogspot.com/2011/03/earth-hour-2011.html
- earth hour 2010: http://jonathaninthedistance.blogspot.com/2010/03/earth-hour-2010.html
- earth hour 2009: http://jonathaninthedistance.blogspot.com/2009/03/earth-hour-2009.html
Labels:
media
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
red meat: good or bad?
just when i thought it was time for a post on nutrition, lo and behold a nutrition topic comes up in the news and makes all the headlines. i'm referencing a slate of media reports referencing a recent Harvard study, all of which allege that the study shows that any amount of red meat in your diet is bad for your health, even to the extent that it shortens your lifespan.
you can check out a sample of the media reports:
i'll put it this way: i believe in the body of medical science that finds that red meat is a driver of cholesterol, bad fats, and various assorted factors harmful to health. i do not, however, believe that this makes red meat a sole source of harm (which is what i think these media reports are doing). there's issues with many other sources of nutrition, particularly sources of protein. the issue is not red meat alone, but more about the larger composition of your nutrition overall.
i found some useful sources that i think respond directly to the media reports above:
my personal position in light of the opposing viewpoints on red meat? i monitor my red meat intake, but i also monitor all of my protein intake regardless of source, just like i monitor all of my nutritional intake in general.
here's an example that i think illustrates my motivation: red meat is high in cholesterol. but so is shrimp. and eggs. and some forms of vegetables and fruit. so treating red meat as the sole culprit won't solve all your problems. if cholesterol is the concern then it's necessary to watch out for it in all foods.
and that's the principle i think that we really need to remember: we have to be mindful about all of our nutrition, not just a little.
you can check out a sample of the media reports:
- LA Times: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/13/health/la-he-red-meat-20120313
- CNN.com: http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/12/health/red-meat-shorten-lifespan/index.html
- Baltimore Sun: http://www.baltimoresun.com/health/boostershots/la-heb-red-meat-why-bad-20120314,0,878460.story
i'll put it this way: i believe in the body of medical science that finds that red meat is a driver of cholesterol, bad fats, and various assorted factors harmful to health. i do not, however, believe that this makes red meat a sole source of harm (which is what i think these media reports are doing). there's issues with many other sources of nutrition, particularly sources of protein. the issue is not red meat alone, but more about the larger composition of your nutrition overall.
i found some useful sources that i think respond directly to the media reports above:
- livestrong.com: http://www.livestrong.com/blog/are-burgers-healthy-why-red-meat-is-not-bad-for-you/
- mark's daily apple: http://www.marksdailyapple.com/will-eating-red-meat-kill-you/#axzz1pdRhGcmQ
- mayo clinic: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/red-meat/MY01329
my personal position in light of the opposing viewpoints on red meat? i monitor my red meat intake, but i also monitor all of my protein intake regardless of source, just like i monitor all of my nutritional intake in general.
here's an example that i think illustrates my motivation: red meat is high in cholesterol. but so is shrimp. and eggs. and some forms of vegetables and fruit. so treating red meat as the sole culprit won't solve all your problems. if cholesterol is the concern then it's necessary to watch out for it in all foods.
and that's the principle i think that we really need to remember: we have to be mindful about all of our nutrition, not just a little.
Labels:
nutrition
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
a yoga controversy
i was going to post on this before, but i wanted to wait until there had been some more presentation of perspectives on the topic.
i'm referring to a New York Times article that asserted a dangerous side to yoga. it was a relatively lengthy piece detailing injury risks to yoga practitioners, and alleged that such risks are increasingly ignored, denied, or even exacerbated by yoga programs in the United States. the article also alleges that this situation is a result of yoga's rise in popularity, which has spurred a rise in the number of yoga instructors of questionable ability.
you can check out the article for yourself:
i also wanted to offer additional links that respond to the New York Times piece that i think provide additional perspectives (pro and con) to its arguments:
they did (and do) yoga for therapeutic purposes, using it as a way of mental, spiritual, and physical rejuvenation from the afflictions brought by racing, training, and ordinary living. i tried to do the same, but instead found that while it offers mental and spiritual benefits, it physically did little to address my injuries or ailments--in fact, if anything, it actually made them worse. by ankle issues got worse, my hamstring issues got worse, my back issues got worse, my neck issues got worse, everything got worse.
obviously, i discontinued yoga and don't do it anymore. i've ended up finding physical rejuvenation via other ways. i'm not going to discount or deny yoga categorically, since i've seen it work well for other people. i will, however, say that it's just not for me (and apparently, based on these articles, for some others as well).
which i think is my point on this debate: different people have different bodies, and so they have to do yoga differently in ways appropriate for them individually. and in some cases, like mine, they will have to not do yoga altogether.
this makes the choice of yoga a function of 1) personal self-awareness and personal judgment regarding what is good for you, and 2) teacher awareness and teacher judgement regarding what works for you. the challenge is making sure you are mindful of both, and not just someone mindlessly doing something just because it's popular. in short, take the time to understand, and then act once you do.
How Yoga Can Wreck Your Body
New York Times
January 5, 2012
By William J. Broad
On a cold Saturday in early 2009, Glenn Black, a yoga teacher of nearly four decades, whose devoted clientele includes a number of celebrities and prominent gurus, was giving a master class at Sankalpah Yoga in Manhattan. Black is, in many ways, a classic yogi: he studied in Pune, India, at the institute founded by the legendary B. K. S. Iyengar, and spent years in solitude and meditation. He now lives in Rhinebeck, N.Y., and often teaches at the nearby Omega Institute, a New Age emporium spread over nearly 200 acres of woods and gardens. He is known for his rigor and his down-to-earth style. But this was not why I sought him out: Black, I’d been told, was the person to speak with if you wanted to know not about the virtues of yoga but rather about the damage it could do. Many of his regular clients came to him for bodywork or rehabilitation following yoga injuries. This was the situation I found myself in. In my 30s, I had somehow managed to rupture a disk in my lower back and found I could prevent bouts of pain with a selection of yoga postures and abdominal exercises. Then, in 2007, while doing the extended-side-angle pose, a posture hailed as a cure for many diseases, my back gave way. With it went my belief, naïve in retrospect, that yoga was a source only of healing and never harm.
At Sankalpah Yoga, the room was packed; roughly half the students were said to be teachers themselves. Black walked around the room, joking and talking. “Is this yoga?” he asked as we sweated through a pose that seemed to demand superhuman endurance. “It is if you’re paying attention.” His approach was almost free-form: he made us hold poses for a long time but taught no inversions and few classical postures. Throughout the class, he urged us to pay attention to the thresholds of pain. “I make it as hard as possible,” he told the group. “It’s up to you to make it easy on yourself.” He drove his point home with a cautionary tale. In India, he recalled, a yogi came to study at Iyengar’s school and threw himself into a spinal twist. Black said he watched in disbelief as three of the man’s ribs gave way — pop, pop, pop.
After class, I asked Black about his approach to teaching yoga — the emphasis on holding only a few simple poses, the absence of common inversions like headstands and shoulder stands. He gave me the kind of answer you’d expect from any yoga teacher: that awareness is more important than rushing through a series of postures just to say you’d done them. But then he said something more radical. Black has come to believe that “the vast majority of people” should give up yoga altogether. It’s simply too likely to cause harm.
Not just students but celebrated teachers too, Black said, injure themselves in droves because most have underlying physical weaknesses or problems that make serious injury all but inevitable. Instead of doing yoga, “they need to be doing a specific range of motions for articulation, for organ condition,” he said, to strengthen weak parts of the body. “Yoga is for people in good physical condition. Or it can be used therapeutically. It’s controversial to say, but it really shouldn’t be used for a general class.”
Black seemingly reconciles the dangers of yoga with his own teaching of it by working hard at knowing when a student “shouldn’t do something — the shoulder stand, the headstand or putting any weight on the cervical vertebrae.” Though he studied with Shmuel Tatz, a legendary Manhattan-based physical therapist who devised a method of massage and alignment for actors and dancers, he acknowledges that he has no formal training for determining which poses are good for a student and which may be problematic. What he does have, he says, is “a ton of experience.”
“To come to New York and do a class with people who have many problems and say, ‘O.K., we’re going to do this sequence of poses today’ — it just doesn’t work.”
According to Black, a number of factors have converged to heighten the risk of practicing yoga. The biggest is the demographic shift in those who study it. Indian practitioners of yoga typically squatted and sat cross-legged in daily life, and yoga poses, or asanas, were an outgrowth of these postures. Now urbanites who sit in chairs all day walk into a studio a couple of times a week and strain to twist themselves into ever-more-difficult postures despite their lack of flexibility and other physical problems.
Many come to yoga as a gentle alternative to vigorous sports or for rehabilitation for injuries. But yoga’s exploding popularity — the number of Americans doing yoga has risen from about 4 million in 2001 to what some estimate to be as many as 20 million in 2011 — means that there is now an abundance of studios where many teachers lack the deeper training necessary to recognize when students are headed toward injury. “Today many schools of yoga are just about pushing people,” Black said. “You can’t believe what’s going on — teachers jumping on people, pushing and pulling and saying, ‘You should be able to do this by now.’ It has to do with their egos.”
When yoga teachers come to him for bodywork after suffering major traumas, Black tells them, “Don’t do yoga.” “They look at me like I’m crazy,” he goes on to say. “And I know if they continue, they won’t be able to take it.” I asked him about the worst injuries he’d seen. He spoke of well-known yoga teachers doing such basic poses as downward-facing dog, in which the body forms an inverted V, so strenuously that they tore Achilles tendons. “It’s ego,” he said. “The whole point of yoga is to get rid of ego.” He said he had seen some “pretty gruesome hips.” “One of the biggest teachers in America had zero movement in her hip joints,” Black told me. “The sockets had become so degenerated that she had to have hip replacements.” I asked if she still taught. “Oh, yeah,” Black replied. “There are other yoga teachers that have such bad backs they have to lie down to teach. I’d be so embarrassed.”
Among devotees, from gurus to acolytes forever carrying their rolled-up mats, yoga is described as a nearly miraculous agent of renewal and healing. They celebrate its abilities to calm, cure, energize and strengthen. And much of this appears to be true: yoga can lower your blood pressure, make chemicals that act as antidepressants, even improve your sex life. But the yoga community long remained silent about its potential to inflict blinding pain. Jagannath G. Gune, who helped revive yoga for the modern era, made no allusion to injuries in his journal Yoga Mimansa or his 1931 book “Asanas.” Indra Devi avoided the issue in her 1953 best seller “Forever Young, Forever Healthy,” as did B. K. S. Iyengar in his seminal “Light on Yoga,” published in 1965. Reassurances about yoga’s safety also make regular appearances in the how-to books of such yogis as Swami Sivananda, K. Pattabhi Jois and Bikram Choudhury. “Real yoga is as safe as mother’s milk,” declared Swami Gitananda, a guru who made 10 world tours and founded ashrams on several continents.
But a growing body of medical evidence supports Black’s contention that, for many people, a number of commonly taught yoga poses are inherently risky. The first reports of yoga injuries appeared decades ago, published in some of the world’s most respected journals — among them, Neurology, The British Medical Journal and The Journal of the American Medical Association. The problems ranged from relatively mild injuries to permanent disabilities. In one case, a male college student, after more than a year of doing yoga, decided to intensify his practice. He would sit upright on his heels in a kneeling position known as vajrasana for hours a day, chanting for world peace. Soon he was experiencing difficulty walking, running and climbing stairs.
Doctors traced the problem to an unresponsive nerve, a peripheral branch of the sciatic, which runs from the lower spine through the buttocks and down the legs. Sitting in vajrasana deprived the branch that runs below the knee of oxygen, deadening the nerve. Once the student gave up the pose, he improved rapidly. Clinicians recorded a number of similar cases and the condition even got its own name: “yoga foot drop.”
More troubling reports followed. In 1972 a prominent Oxford neurophysiologist, W. Ritchie Russell, published an article in The British Medical Journal arguing that, while rare, some yoga postures threatened to cause strokes even in relatively young, healthy people. Russell found that brain injuries arose not only from direct trauma to the head but also from quick movements or excessive extensions of the neck, such as occur in whiplash — or certain yoga poses. Normally, the neck can stretch backward 75 degrees, forward 40 degrees and sideways 45 degrees, and it can rotate on its axis about 50 degrees. Yoga practitioners typically move the vertebrae much farther. An intermediate student can easily turn his or her neck 90 degrees — nearly twice the normal rotation.
Hyperflexion of the neck was encouraged by experienced practitioners. Iyengar emphasized that in cobra pose, the head should arch “as far back as possible” and insisted that in the shoulder stand, in which the chin is tucked deep in the chest, the trunk and head forming a right angle, “the body should be in one straight line, perpendicular to the floor.” He called the pose, said to stimulate the thyroid, “one of the greatest boons conferred on humanity by our ancient sages.”
Extreme motions of the head and neck, Russell warned, could wound the vertebral arteries, producing clots, swelling and constriction, and eventually wreak havoc in the brain. The basilar artery, which arises from the union of the two vertebral arteries and forms a wide conduit at the base of the brain, was of particular concern. It feeds such structures as the pons (which plays a role in respiration), the cerebellum (which coordinates the muscles), the occipital lobe of the outer brain (which turns eye impulses into images) and the thalamus (which relays sensory messages to the outer brain).
Reductions in blood flow to the basilar artery are known to produce a variety of strokes. These rarely affect language and conscious thinking (often said to be located in the frontal cortex) but can severely damage the body’s core machinery and sometimes be fatal. The majority of patients suffering such a stroke do recover most functions. But in some cases headaches, imbalance, dizziness and difficulty in making fine movements persist for years.
Russell also worried that when strokes hit yoga practitioners, doctors might fail to trace their cause. The cerebral damage, he wrote, “may be delayed, perhaps to appear during the night following, and this delay of some hours distracts attention from the earlier precipitating factor.”
In 1973, a year after Russell’s paper was published, Willibald Nagler, a renowned authority on spinal rehabilitation at Cornell University Medical College, published a paper on a strange case. A healthy woman of 28 suffered a stroke while doing a yoga position known as the wheel or upward bow, in which the practitioner lies on her back, then lifts her body into a semicircular arc, balancing on hands and feet. An intermediate stage often involves raising the trunk and resting the crown of the head on the floor. While balanced on her head, her neck bent far backward, the woman “suddenly felt a severe throbbing headache.” She had difficulty getting up, and when helped into a standing position, was unable to walk without assistance. The woman was rushed to the hospital. She had no sensation on the right side of her body; her left arm and leg responded poorly to her commands. Her eyes kept glancing involuntarily to the left. And the left side of her face showed a contracted pupil, a drooping upper eyelid and a rising lower lid — a cluster of symptoms known as Horner’s syndrome. Nagler reported that the woman also had a tendency to fall to the left.
Her doctors found that the woman’s left vertebral artery, which runs between the first two cervical vertebrae, had narrowed considerably and that the arteries feeding her cerebellum had undergone severe displacement. Given the lack of advanced imaging technologies at the time, an exploratory operation was conducted to get a clearer sense of her injuries. The surgeons who opened her skull found that the left hemisphere of her cerebellum suffered a major failure of blood supply that resulted in much dead tissue and that the site was seeped in secondary hemorrhages.
The patient began an intensive program of rehabilitation. Two years later, she was able to walk, Nagler reported, “with [a] broad-based gait.” But her left arm continued to wander and her left eye continued to show Horner’s syndrome. Nagler concluded that such injuries appeared to be rare but served as a warning about the hazards of “forceful hyperextension of the neck.” He urged caution in recommending such postures, particularly to individuals of middle age.
The experience of Nagler’s patient was not an isolated incident. A few years later, a 25-year-old man was rushed to Northwestern Memorial Hospital, in Chicago, complaining of blurred vision, difficulty swallowing and controlling the left side of his body. Steven H. Hanus, a medical student at the time, became interested in the case and worked with the chairman of the neurology department to determine the cause (he later published the results with several colleagues). The patient had been in excellent health, practicing yoga every morning for a year and a half. His routine included spinal twists in which he rotated his head far to the left and far to the right. Then he would do a shoulder stand with his neck “maximally flexed against the bare floor,” just as Iyengar had instructed, remaining in the inversion for about five minutes. A series of bruises ran down the man’s lower neck, which, the team wrote in The Archives of Neurology, “resulted from repeated contact with the hard floor surface on which he did yoga exercises.” These were a sign of neck trauma.
Diagnostic tests revealed blockages of the left vertebral artery between the c2 and c3 vertebrae; the blood vessel there had suffered “total or nearly complete occlusion” — in other words, no blood could get through to the brain.
Two months after his attack, and after much physical therapy, the man was able to walk with a cane. But, the team reported, he “continued to have pronounced difficulty performing fine movements with his left hand.” Hanus and his colleagues concluded that the young man’s condition represented a new kind of danger. Healthy individuals could seriously damage their vertebral arteries, they warned, “by neck movements that exceed physiological tolerance.” Yoga, they stressed, “should be considered as a possible precipitating event.” In its report, the Northwestern team cited not only Nagler’s account of his female patient but also Russell’s early warning. Concern about yoga’s safety began to ripple through the medical establishment.
These cases may seem exceedingly rare, but surveys by the Consumer Product Safety Commission showed that the number of emergency-room admissions related to yoga, after years of slow increases, was rising quickly. They went from 13 in 2000 to 20 in 2001. Then they more than doubled to 46 in 2002. These surveys rely on sampling rather than exhaustive reporting — they reveal trends rather than totals — but the spike was nonetheless statistically significant. Only a fraction of the injured visit hospital emergency rooms. Many of those suffering from less serious yoga injuries go to family doctors, chiropractors and various kinds of therapists.
Around this time, stories of yoga-induced injuries began to appear in the media. The Times reported that health professionals found that the penetrating heat of Bikram yoga, for example, could raise the risk of overstretching, muscle damage and torn cartilage. One specialist noted that ligaments — the tough bands of fiber that connect bones or cartilage at a joint — failed to regain their shape once stretched out, raising the risk of strains, sprains and dislocations.
In 2009, a New York City team based at Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons published an ambitious worldwide survey of yoga teachers, therapists and doctors. The answers to the survey’s central question — What were the most serious yoga-related injuries (disabling and/or of long duration) they had seen? — revealed that the largest number of injuries (231) centered on the lower back. The other main sites were, in declining order of prevalence: the shoulder (219), the knee (174) and the neck (110). Then came stroke. The respondents noted four cases in which yoga’s extreme bending and contortions resulted in some degree of brain damage. The numbers weren’t alarming but the acknowledgment of risk — nearly four decades after Russell first issued his warning — pointed to a decided shift in the perception of the dangers yoga posed.
In recent years, reformers in the yoga community have begun to address the issue of yoga-induced damage. In a 2003 article in Yoga Journal, Carol Krucoff — a yoga instructor and therapist who works at the Integrative Medicine center at Duke University in North Carolina — revealed her own struggles. She told of being filmed one day for national television and after being urged to do more, lifting one foot, grabbing her big toe and stretching her leg into the extended-hand-to-big-toe pose. As her leg straightened, she felt a sickening pop in her hamstring. The next day, she could barely walk. Krucoff needed physical therapy and a year of recovery before she could fully extend her leg again. The editor of Yoga Journal, Kaitlin Quistgaard, described reinjuring a torn rotator cuff in a yoga class. “I’ve experienced how yoga can heal,” she wrote. “But I’ve also experienced how yoga can hurt — and I’ve heard the same from plenty of other yogis.”
One of the most vocal reformers is Roger Cole, an Iyengar teacher with degrees in psychology from Stanford and the University of California, San Francisco. Cole has written extensively for Yoga Journal and speaks on yoga safety to the American College of Sports Medicine. In one column, Cole discussed the practice of reducing neck bending in a shoulder stand by lifting the shoulders on a stack of folded blankets and letting the head fall below it. The modification eases the angle between the head and the torso, from 90 degrees to perhaps 110 degrees. Cole ticked off the dangers of doing an unmodified shoulder stand: muscle strains, overstretched ligaments and cervical-disk injuries.
But modifications are not always the solution. Timothy McCall, a physician who is the medical editor of Yoga Journal, called the headstand too dangerous for general yoga classes. His warning was based partly on his own experience. He found that doing the headstand led to thoracic outlet syndrome, a condition that arises from the compression of nerves passing from the neck into the arms, causing tingling in his right hand as well as sporadic numbness. McCall stopped doing the pose, and his symptoms went away. Later, he noted that the inversion could produce other injuries, including degenerative arthritis of the cervical spine and retinal tears (a result of the increased eye pressure caused by the pose). “Unfortunately,” McCall concluded, “the negative effects of headstand can be insidious.”
Almost a year after I first met Glenn Black at his master class in Manhattan, I received an e-mail from him telling me that he had undergone spinal surgery. “It was a success,” he wrote. “Recovery is slow and painful. Call if you like.”
The injury, Black said, had its origins in four decades of extreme backbends and twists. He had developed spinal stenosis — a serious condition in which the openings between vertebrae begin to narrow, compressing spinal nerves and causing excruciating pain. Black said that he felt the tenderness start 20 years ago when he was coming out of such poses as the plow and the shoulder stand. Two years ago, the pain became extreme. One surgeon said that without treatment, he would eventually be unable to walk. The surgery took five hours, fusing together several lumbar vertebrae. He would eventually be fine but was under surgeon’s orders to reduce strain on his lower back. His range of motion would never be the same.
Black is one of the most careful yoga practitioners I know. When I first spoke to him, he said he had never injured himself doing yoga or, as far as he knew, been responsible for harming any of his students. I asked him if his recent injury could have been congenital or related to aging. No, he said. It was yoga. “You have to get a different perspective to see if what you’re doing is going to eventually be bad for you.”
Black recently took that message to a conference at the Omega Institute, his feelings on the subject deepened by his recent operation. But his warnings seemed to fall on deaf ears. “I was a little more emphatic than usual,” he recalled. “My message was that ‘Asana is not a panacea or a cure-all. In fact, if you do it with ego or obsession, you’ll end up causing problems.’ A lot of people don’t like to hear that.”
i'm referring to a New York Times article that asserted a dangerous side to yoga. it was a relatively lengthy piece detailing injury risks to yoga practitioners, and alleged that such risks are increasingly ignored, denied, or even exacerbated by yoga programs in the United States. the article also alleges that this situation is a result of yoga's rise in popularity, which has spurred a rise in the number of yoga instructors of questionable ability.
you can check out the article for yourself:
i also wanted to offer additional links that respond to the New York Times piece that i think provide additional perspectives (pro and con) to its arguments:
- CBS Chicago: http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/02/13/debate-over-yoga-injuries-is-anything-but-relaxing/
- The Daily Beast: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/01/10/yoga-instructors-push-back-at-new-york-times-article-on-injury-risk.html
they did (and do) yoga for therapeutic purposes, using it as a way of mental, spiritual, and physical rejuvenation from the afflictions brought by racing, training, and ordinary living. i tried to do the same, but instead found that while it offers mental and spiritual benefits, it physically did little to address my injuries or ailments--in fact, if anything, it actually made them worse. by ankle issues got worse, my hamstring issues got worse, my back issues got worse, my neck issues got worse, everything got worse.
obviously, i discontinued yoga and don't do it anymore. i've ended up finding physical rejuvenation via other ways. i'm not going to discount or deny yoga categorically, since i've seen it work well for other people. i will, however, say that it's just not for me (and apparently, based on these articles, for some others as well).
which i think is my point on this debate: different people have different bodies, and so they have to do yoga differently in ways appropriate for them individually. and in some cases, like mine, they will have to not do yoga altogether.
this makes the choice of yoga a function of 1) personal self-awareness and personal judgment regarding what is good for you, and 2) teacher awareness and teacher judgement regarding what works for you. the challenge is making sure you are mindful of both, and not just someone mindlessly doing something just because it's popular. in short, take the time to understand, and then act once you do.
How Yoga Can Wreck Your Body
New York Times
January 5, 2012
By William J. Broad
On a cold Saturday in early 2009, Glenn Black, a yoga teacher of nearly four decades, whose devoted clientele includes a number of celebrities and prominent gurus, was giving a master class at Sankalpah Yoga in Manhattan. Black is, in many ways, a classic yogi: he studied in Pune, India, at the institute founded by the legendary B. K. S. Iyengar, and spent years in solitude and meditation. He now lives in Rhinebeck, N.Y., and often teaches at the nearby Omega Institute, a New Age emporium spread over nearly 200 acres of woods and gardens. He is known for his rigor and his down-to-earth style. But this was not why I sought him out: Black, I’d been told, was the person to speak with if you wanted to know not about the virtues of yoga but rather about the damage it could do. Many of his regular clients came to him for bodywork or rehabilitation following yoga injuries. This was the situation I found myself in. In my 30s, I had somehow managed to rupture a disk in my lower back and found I could prevent bouts of pain with a selection of yoga postures and abdominal exercises. Then, in 2007, while doing the extended-side-angle pose, a posture hailed as a cure for many diseases, my back gave way. With it went my belief, naïve in retrospect, that yoga was a source only of healing and never harm.
At Sankalpah Yoga, the room was packed; roughly half the students were said to be teachers themselves. Black walked around the room, joking and talking. “Is this yoga?” he asked as we sweated through a pose that seemed to demand superhuman endurance. “It is if you’re paying attention.” His approach was almost free-form: he made us hold poses for a long time but taught no inversions and few classical postures. Throughout the class, he urged us to pay attention to the thresholds of pain. “I make it as hard as possible,” he told the group. “It’s up to you to make it easy on yourself.” He drove his point home with a cautionary tale. In India, he recalled, a yogi came to study at Iyengar’s school and threw himself into a spinal twist. Black said he watched in disbelief as three of the man’s ribs gave way — pop, pop, pop.
After class, I asked Black about his approach to teaching yoga — the emphasis on holding only a few simple poses, the absence of common inversions like headstands and shoulder stands. He gave me the kind of answer you’d expect from any yoga teacher: that awareness is more important than rushing through a series of postures just to say you’d done them. But then he said something more radical. Black has come to believe that “the vast majority of people” should give up yoga altogether. It’s simply too likely to cause harm.
Not just students but celebrated teachers too, Black said, injure themselves in droves because most have underlying physical weaknesses or problems that make serious injury all but inevitable. Instead of doing yoga, “they need to be doing a specific range of motions for articulation, for organ condition,” he said, to strengthen weak parts of the body. “Yoga is for people in good physical condition. Or it can be used therapeutically. It’s controversial to say, but it really shouldn’t be used for a general class.”
Black seemingly reconciles the dangers of yoga with his own teaching of it by working hard at knowing when a student “shouldn’t do something — the shoulder stand, the headstand or putting any weight on the cervical vertebrae.” Though he studied with Shmuel Tatz, a legendary Manhattan-based physical therapist who devised a method of massage and alignment for actors and dancers, he acknowledges that he has no formal training for determining which poses are good for a student and which may be problematic. What he does have, he says, is “a ton of experience.”
“To come to New York and do a class with people who have many problems and say, ‘O.K., we’re going to do this sequence of poses today’ — it just doesn’t work.”
According to Black, a number of factors have converged to heighten the risk of practicing yoga. The biggest is the demographic shift in those who study it. Indian practitioners of yoga typically squatted and sat cross-legged in daily life, and yoga poses, or asanas, were an outgrowth of these postures. Now urbanites who sit in chairs all day walk into a studio a couple of times a week and strain to twist themselves into ever-more-difficult postures despite their lack of flexibility and other physical problems.
Many come to yoga as a gentle alternative to vigorous sports or for rehabilitation for injuries. But yoga’s exploding popularity — the number of Americans doing yoga has risen from about 4 million in 2001 to what some estimate to be as many as 20 million in 2011 — means that there is now an abundance of studios where many teachers lack the deeper training necessary to recognize when students are headed toward injury. “Today many schools of yoga are just about pushing people,” Black said. “You can’t believe what’s going on — teachers jumping on people, pushing and pulling and saying, ‘You should be able to do this by now.’ It has to do with their egos.”
When yoga teachers come to him for bodywork after suffering major traumas, Black tells them, “Don’t do yoga.” “They look at me like I’m crazy,” he goes on to say. “And I know if they continue, they won’t be able to take it.” I asked him about the worst injuries he’d seen. He spoke of well-known yoga teachers doing such basic poses as downward-facing dog, in which the body forms an inverted V, so strenuously that they tore Achilles tendons. “It’s ego,” he said. “The whole point of yoga is to get rid of ego.” He said he had seen some “pretty gruesome hips.” “One of the biggest teachers in America had zero movement in her hip joints,” Black told me. “The sockets had become so degenerated that she had to have hip replacements.” I asked if she still taught. “Oh, yeah,” Black replied. “There are other yoga teachers that have such bad backs they have to lie down to teach. I’d be so embarrassed.”
Among devotees, from gurus to acolytes forever carrying their rolled-up mats, yoga is described as a nearly miraculous agent of renewal and healing. They celebrate its abilities to calm, cure, energize and strengthen. And much of this appears to be true: yoga can lower your blood pressure, make chemicals that act as antidepressants, even improve your sex life. But the yoga community long remained silent about its potential to inflict blinding pain. Jagannath G. Gune, who helped revive yoga for the modern era, made no allusion to injuries in his journal Yoga Mimansa or his 1931 book “Asanas.” Indra Devi avoided the issue in her 1953 best seller “Forever Young, Forever Healthy,” as did B. K. S. Iyengar in his seminal “Light on Yoga,” published in 1965. Reassurances about yoga’s safety also make regular appearances in the how-to books of such yogis as Swami Sivananda, K. Pattabhi Jois and Bikram Choudhury. “Real yoga is as safe as mother’s milk,” declared Swami Gitananda, a guru who made 10 world tours and founded ashrams on several continents.
But a growing body of medical evidence supports Black’s contention that, for many people, a number of commonly taught yoga poses are inherently risky. The first reports of yoga injuries appeared decades ago, published in some of the world’s most respected journals — among them, Neurology, The British Medical Journal and The Journal of the American Medical Association. The problems ranged from relatively mild injuries to permanent disabilities. In one case, a male college student, after more than a year of doing yoga, decided to intensify his practice. He would sit upright on his heels in a kneeling position known as vajrasana for hours a day, chanting for world peace. Soon he was experiencing difficulty walking, running and climbing stairs.
Doctors traced the problem to an unresponsive nerve, a peripheral branch of the sciatic, which runs from the lower spine through the buttocks and down the legs. Sitting in vajrasana deprived the branch that runs below the knee of oxygen, deadening the nerve. Once the student gave up the pose, he improved rapidly. Clinicians recorded a number of similar cases and the condition even got its own name: “yoga foot drop.”
More troubling reports followed. In 1972 a prominent Oxford neurophysiologist, W. Ritchie Russell, published an article in The British Medical Journal arguing that, while rare, some yoga postures threatened to cause strokes even in relatively young, healthy people. Russell found that brain injuries arose not only from direct trauma to the head but also from quick movements or excessive extensions of the neck, such as occur in whiplash — or certain yoga poses. Normally, the neck can stretch backward 75 degrees, forward 40 degrees and sideways 45 degrees, and it can rotate on its axis about 50 degrees. Yoga practitioners typically move the vertebrae much farther. An intermediate student can easily turn his or her neck 90 degrees — nearly twice the normal rotation.
Hyperflexion of the neck was encouraged by experienced practitioners. Iyengar emphasized that in cobra pose, the head should arch “as far back as possible” and insisted that in the shoulder stand, in which the chin is tucked deep in the chest, the trunk and head forming a right angle, “the body should be in one straight line, perpendicular to the floor.” He called the pose, said to stimulate the thyroid, “one of the greatest boons conferred on humanity by our ancient sages.”
Extreme motions of the head and neck, Russell warned, could wound the vertebral arteries, producing clots, swelling and constriction, and eventually wreak havoc in the brain. The basilar artery, which arises from the union of the two vertebral arteries and forms a wide conduit at the base of the brain, was of particular concern. It feeds such structures as the pons (which plays a role in respiration), the cerebellum (which coordinates the muscles), the occipital lobe of the outer brain (which turns eye impulses into images) and the thalamus (which relays sensory messages to the outer brain).
Reductions in blood flow to the basilar artery are known to produce a variety of strokes. These rarely affect language and conscious thinking (often said to be located in the frontal cortex) but can severely damage the body’s core machinery and sometimes be fatal. The majority of patients suffering such a stroke do recover most functions. But in some cases headaches, imbalance, dizziness and difficulty in making fine movements persist for years.
Russell also worried that when strokes hit yoga practitioners, doctors might fail to trace their cause. The cerebral damage, he wrote, “may be delayed, perhaps to appear during the night following, and this delay of some hours distracts attention from the earlier precipitating factor.”
In 1973, a year after Russell’s paper was published, Willibald Nagler, a renowned authority on spinal rehabilitation at Cornell University Medical College, published a paper on a strange case. A healthy woman of 28 suffered a stroke while doing a yoga position known as the wheel or upward bow, in which the practitioner lies on her back, then lifts her body into a semicircular arc, balancing on hands and feet. An intermediate stage often involves raising the trunk and resting the crown of the head on the floor. While balanced on her head, her neck bent far backward, the woman “suddenly felt a severe throbbing headache.” She had difficulty getting up, and when helped into a standing position, was unable to walk without assistance. The woman was rushed to the hospital. She had no sensation on the right side of her body; her left arm and leg responded poorly to her commands. Her eyes kept glancing involuntarily to the left. And the left side of her face showed a contracted pupil, a drooping upper eyelid and a rising lower lid — a cluster of symptoms known as Horner’s syndrome. Nagler reported that the woman also had a tendency to fall to the left.
Her doctors found that the woman’s left vertebral artery, which runs between the first two cervical vertebrae, had narrowed considerably and that the arteries feeding her cerebellum had undergone severe displacement. Given the lack of advanced imaging technologies at the time, an exploratory operation was conducted to get a clearer sense of her injuries. The surgeons who opened her skull found that the left hemisphere of her cerebellum suffered a major failure of blood supply that resulted in much dead tissue and that the site was seeped in secondary hemorrhages.
The patient began an intensive program of rehabilitation. Two years later, she was able to walk, Nagler reported, “with [a] broad-based gait.” But her left arm continued to wander and her left eye continued to show Horner’s syndrome. Nagler concluded that such injuries appeared to be rare but served as a warning about the hazards of “forceful hyperextension of the neck.” He urged caution in recommending such postures, particularly to individuals of middle age.
The experience of Nagler’s patient was not an isolated incident. A few years later, a 25-year-old man was rushed to Northwestern Memorial Hospital, in Chicago, complaining of blurred vision, difficulty swallowing and controlling the left side of his body. Steven H. Hanus, a medical student at the time, became interested in the case and worked with the chairman of the neurology department to determine the cause (he later published the results with several colleagues). The patient had been in excellent health, practicing yoga every morning for a year and a half. His routine included spinal twists in which he rotated his head far to the left and far to the right. Then he would do a shoulder stand with his neck “maximally flexed against the bare floor,” just as Iyengar had instructed, remaining in the inversion for about five minutes. A series of bruises ran down the man’s lower neck, which, the team wrote in The Archives of Neurology, “resulted from repeated contact with the hard floor surface on which he did yoga exercises.” These were a sign of neck trauma.
Diagnostic tests revealed blockages of the left vertebral artery between the c2 and c3 vertebrae; the blood vessel there had suffered “total or nearly complete occlusion” — in other words, no blood could get through to the brain.
Two months after his attack, and after much physical therapy, the man was able to walk with a cane. But, the team reported, he “continued to have pronounced difficulty performing fine movements with his left hand.” Hanus and his colleagues concluded that the young man’s condition represented a new kind of danger. Healthy individuals could seriously damage their vertebral arteries, they warned, “by neck movements that exceed physiological tolerance.” Yoga, they stressed, “should be considered as a possible precipitating event.” In its report, the Northwestern team cited not only Nagler’s account of his female patient but also Russell’s early warning. Concern about yoga’s safety began to ripple through the medical establishment.
These cases may seem exceedingly rare, but surveys by the Consumer Product Safety Commission showed that the number of emergency-room admissions related to yoga, after years of slow increases, was rising quickly. They went from 13 in 2000 to 20 in 2001. Then they more than doubled to 46 in 2002. These surveys rely on sampling rather than exhaustive reporting — they reveal trends rather than totals — but the spike was nonetheless statistically significant. Only a fraction of the injured visit hospital emergency rooms. Many of those suffering from less serious yoga injuries go to family doctors, chiropractors and various kinds of therapists.
Around this time, stories of yoga-induced injuries began to appear in the media. The Times reported that health professionals found that the penetrating heat of Bikram yoga, for example, could raise the risk of overstretching, muscle damage and torn cartilage. One specialist noted that ligaments — the tough bands of fiber that connect bones or cartilage at a joint — failed to regain their shape once stretched out, raising the risk of strains, sprains and dislocations.
In 2009, a New York City team based at Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons published an ambitious worldwide survey of yoga teachers, therapists and doctors. The answers to the survey’s central question — What were the most serious yoga-related injuries (disabling and/or of long duration) they had seen? — revealed that the largest number of injuries (231) centered on the lower back. The other main sites were, in declining order of prevalence: the shoulder (219), the knee (174) and the neck (110). Then came stroke. The respondents noted four cases in which yoga’s extreme bending and contortions resulted in some degree of brain damage. The numbers weren’t alarming but the acknowledgment of risk — nearly four decades after Russell first issued his warning — pointed to a decided shift in the perception of the dangers yoga posed.
In recent years, reformers in the yoga community have begun to address the issue of yoga-induced damage. In a 2003 article in Yoga Journal, Carol Krucoff — a yoga instructor and therapist who works at the Integrative Medicine center at Duke University in North Carolina — revealed her own struggles. She told of being filmed one day for national television and after being urged to do more, lifting one foot, grabbing her big toe and stretching her leg into the extended-hand-to-big-toe pose. As her leg straightened, she felt a sickening pop in her hamstring. The next day, she could barely walk. Krucoff needed physical therapy and a year of recovery before she could fully extend her leg again. The editor of Yoga Journal, Kaitlin Quistgaard, described reinjuring a torn rotator cuff in a yoga class. “I’ve experienced how yoga can heal,” she wrote. “But I’ve also experienced how yoga can hurt — and I’ve heard the same from plenty of other yogis.”
One of the most vocal reformers is Roger Cole, an Iyengar teacher with degrees in psychology from Stanford and the University of California, San Francisco. Cole has written extensively for Yoga Journal and speaks on yoga safety to the American College of Sports Medicine. In one column, Cole discussed the practice of reducing neck bending in a shoulder stand by lifting the shoulders on a stack of folded blankets and letting the head fall below it. The modification eases the angle between the head and the torso, from 90 degrees to perhaps 110 degrees. Cole ticked off the dangers of doing an unmodified shoulder stand: muscle strains, overstretched ligaments and cervical-disk injuries.
But modifications are not always the solution. Timothy McCall, a physician who is the medical editor of Yoga Journal, called the headstand too dangerous for general yoga classes. His warning was based partly on his own experience. He found that doing the headstand led to thoracic outlet syndrome, a condition that arises from the compression of nerves passing from the neck into the arms, causing tingling in his right hand as well as sporadic numbness. McCall stopped doing the pose, and his symptoms went away. Later, he noted that the inversion could produce other injuries, including degenerative arthritis of the cervical spine and retinal tears (a result of the increased eye pressure caused by the pose). “Unfortunately,” McCall concluded, “the negative effects of headstand can be insidious.”
Almost a year after I first met Glenn Black at his master class in Manhattan, I received an e-mail from him telling me that he had undergone spinal surgery. “It was a success,” he wrote. “Recovery is slow and painful. Call if you like.”
The injury, Black said, had its origins in four decades of extreme backbends and twists. He had developed spinal stenosis — a serious condition in which the openings between vertebrae begin to narrow, compressing spinal nerves and causing excruciating pain. Black said that he felt the tenderness start 20 years ago when he was coming out of such poses as the plow and the shoulder stand. Two years ago, the pain became extreme. One surgeon said that without treatment, he would eventually be unable to walk. The surgery took five hours, fusing together several lumbar vertebrae. He would eventually be fine but was under surgeon’s orders to reduce strain on his lower back. His range of motion would never be the same.
Black is one of the most careful yoga practitioners I know. When I first spoke to him, he said he had never injured himself doing yoga or, as far as he knew, been responsible for harming any of his students. I asked him if his recent injury could have been congenital or related to aging. No, he said. It was yoga. “You have to get a different perspective to see if what you’re doing is going to eventually be bad for you.”
Black recently took that message to a conference at the Omega Institute, his feelings on the subject deepened by his recent operation. But his warnings seemed to fall on deaf ears. “I was a little more emphatic than usual,” he recalled. “My message was that ‘Asana is not a panacea or a cure-all. In fact, if you do it with ego or obsession, you’ll end up causing problems.’ A lot of people don’t like to hear that.”
Labels:
media
Saturday, February 11, 2012
stories of sportsmanship
well, given the nature of these times, human nature seems to reveal itself in all its glory--or lack thereof. times of stress seem to generate a polarization in character, such that we get to see either the best or the worst of humanity. it can be by turns inspiring, exhilirating, affirming or disheartening, depressing, and negative.
to help sway the state of things to the former and away from the latter, i figured i'd use the generally increased available time of deep winter to encourage some reflection and contemplation on the better parts of human nature. i figured to do so by identifying instances where humanity managed to achieve a measure of good character despite being in situations we typically consider to be most conducive to the exact opposite. specifically, i wanted to remind ourselves of the capacity to for sportsmanship, and that even in the context of impassioned hostility that can occur in the fields of intense play, in the arenas of mandatory competition, under situations of supreme duress, at the highest levels of sport we can still exercise the strength of character to manifest the best parts of our humanity. we can and should, in short, be noble.
so to that effect, i'll offer a compilation of what i've written about sportsmanship before:
it's not just good to be good. it's necessary to be noble. especially if we are to make this world a better place. because the world starts--and ends--with us.
to help sway the state of things to the former and away from the latter, i figured i'd use the generally increased available time of deep winter to encourage some reflection and contemplation on the better parts of human nature. i figured to do so by identifying instances where humanity managed to achieve a measure of good character despite being in situations we typically consider to be most conducive to the exact opposite. specifically, i wanted to remind ourselves of the capacity to for sportsmanship, and that even in the context of impassioned hostility that can occur in the fields of intense play, in the arenas of mandatory competition, under situations of supreme duress, at the highest levels of sport we can still exercise the strength of character to manifest the best parts of our humanity. we can and should, in short, be noble.
so to that effect, i'll offer a compilation of what i've written about sportsmanship before:
- how to run a straight race: http://jonathaninthedistance.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-to-run-straight-race.html
- luz long and jesse owens: http://jonathaninthedistance.blogspot.com/2009/08/luz-long-and-jessie-owens.html
- why i love the olympics (part 3): http://jonathaninthedistance.blogspot.com/2008/08/why-i-love-olympics-part-3.html
- why i love the olympics (part 1): http://jonathaninthedistance.blogspot.com/2008/08/why-i-love-olympics-part-1-class.html
- cheating (part 4): http://jonathaninthedistance.blogspot.com/2007/08/cheating-part-4-hard-way-why-athletes.html
- rules and the kamakura: http://jonathaninthedistance.blogspot.com/2007/02/rules-and-kamakura.html
- Guardian UK Joy of Six: http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/2012/feb/10/joy-of-six-sportsmanship
- Guardian UK Sporting Gestures: http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/mar/29/10-sporting-gestures?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487
it's not just good to be good. it's necessary to be noble. especially if we are to make this world a better place. because the world starts--and ends--with us.
The Joy of Six: Sportsmanship
From the
German who settled Jesse Owens's nerves in Berlin to the man who refused to do
a Willie Young in an FA Cup final, a celebration of sport's honourable moments
1.
Eugenio Monti (1964 Winter Olympic Games)
Who would
expect Great Britain to have any sort of tradition in Olympic bobsleigh? Nobody
in their right mind, that's who. And yet.
The duo of
Tony Nash, a director of a Buckinghamshire engineering concern specialising in
making cigarette machines, and Captain the Honourable Thomas Robin Dixon, an
Eton-educated officer from the Grenadier Guards, made off with two-man gold at
the 1964 Winter Olympics in Innsbruck. Nash was a self-taught driver with poor
eyesight, while brakeman Dixon only gave bobsleigh a whirl as part of a jolly
caper while on service leave in St Moritz. Still, circumstance brought them
together, and the pair became the real deal: as well as winning Olympic gold,
they won the 1965 world championship in St Moritz, and came third in the worlds
in 1963 and 1966. But even great sports stars need a bit of good fortune along
the way, and Nash and Dixon owe the highlight of their career to the generosity
of spirit of one of bobsleigh's all-time legends: the Italian driver Eugenio
Monti.
Monti was
without question bobsleigh's top dog, the dominant figure of the 1950s and
1960s. But despite racking up world titles, Olympic gold was eluding him. He
had won silver in 1956, then in 1960 the event wasn't held. (Californian hosts
Squaw Valley couldn't be bothered to stump up the cash to build a track.) In
1964, he had just turned 36, and time was running out. But desperate times did
not lead to desperate measures. After the first run, the British pair led, only
to find the bolt attaching the runners to the casing of the sled had sheared
off. With no spare, it looked like they would have to default, but Monti
whipped the bolt from his own sled, lending it to the gobsmacked Brits,
suddenly still in the game.
After
three of four runs, Nash and Dixon were in second place, behind Monti's fellow
countrymen Sergio Zardini and Romano Bonagura, and just ahead of Monti and his
brakeman Sergio Siorpaes. They made a dreadful final run – so bad that they
immediately took leave of the track and sourced a nearby bar in which to drown
their sorrows in schnapps – but the track began to cut up and slow down.
Zardini and Bonagura dropped back into the silver medal position, and finally
Monti and Siorpaes failed to elevate himself above bronze.
As Nash
and Dixon raised a few more glasses, Monti was left with quite a consolation
prize: he became the first athlete to be awarded the Pierre de Coubertin medal
for Olympic sportsmanship. (He and his mechanics had also assisted a stricken
Canadian team in the four-man event. Monti didn't win gold in that, either,
naturally.) And proof that the good guys do come first came four years later at
the Grenoble Winter Olympics, when despite being thrown from his bob in
practice and taken to hospital, Monti got back on the horse and landed golds in
the two and four-man events, aged 40.
2.
Luz Long (1936 Olympic Games)
The German
long jumper Carl Ludwig "Luz" Long would also be awarded a Pierre de
Coubertin medal in 1964, albeit posthumously. It is an honour richly deserved;
his act of selflessness is perhaps the most famous in sporting history.
On 4
August 1936, at the Berlin Olympiastadion, US athlete Jesse Owens, who had won
gold in the 100 metres the day before, broke the Olympic record in the first
round of heats for the 200m. Less than 10 minutes after breaking the tape, he
was competing in the qualifying round for the long jump. It was his best
discipline – he was the world-record holder in the event – but things didn't
start well. He had watched Long – whom he had never previously met – take
several practice jumps into the sand. So he took one himself. And was
immediately told that had been his first attempt to qualify, and he had fouled.
With the
heat on, Owens fouled his second jump too, and was a badly timed leap away from
crashing out before the tournament proper had even started. At which point Long
came over to introduce himself. "You should be able to qualify with your
eyes closed," Long told Owens. The two chatted awhile. Long told Owens to
make a mark a few inches behind the takeoff line, as he would easily clear the
minimum distance required to make the final even with that self-imposed
handicap. A calmer Owens went back, took off a foot and a half behind the line,
and scraped into the final by a centimetre. It was a popular leap: according to
the Manchester Guardian, the home crowd gave "a great roar of
admiration" as Owens made it through.
In the
final, Owens broke the Olympic record, then improved it, at 25 feet and 10
inches. Long, beyond all expectation, matched the jump. At which point Owens
turned on the full jets, jumping more than 26 feet with his penultimate leap,
then nearly hitting 26 and a half with his final effort. Long had no answer,
but embraced Owens warmly at the end, while full jets of steam came out of the
ears of Adolf Hitler. "You can melt down all the medals and cups I
have," Owens said years later, "and they wouldn't be a plating on the
24-carat friendship I felt for Long at that moment." The two never met
again; Long was killed fighting for his country in 1943.
3.
Jesse Pennington (1912 FA Cup final)
The most
cynical moment in English football history? It's hard to come up with a more
egregious disgrace than Arsenal defender Willie Young's infamous tripping of 17-year-old
West Ham starlet Paul Allen in the dying moments of the 1980 FA Cup final. With
three minutes to go, the then youngest player to appear in a Cup final flicked
his boot and squirmed brilliantly free of Arsenal's backline, with only Pat
Jennings to beat. A fairytale was in the making but, before Allen could reach
the penalty area, in lumbered Young to trip him up in the most brazen fashion
possible. Young, in Arsenal's yellow away shirt, lay flat on his back across
the sun-drenched Wembley turf, a sick throwback to Charlie George's moment of
glory nine years earlier.
Young was
booked, and should have been sent off; the challenge effectively changed the
rules of football, with referees ordered to come down on practitioners of
professional fouls like a ton of bricks.
Allen was
denied his goal, but West Ham still won the final, so nothing was lost. Apart
from Young's reputation, that is; it's pretty much all he's remembered for
these days, despite, as David Lacey pointed out in the furious aftermath of his
Wembley disgrace, his being "a basically honest player". Few
romantics will have much in the way of sympathy.
And the
moral of the story can be found in a simple compare and contrast with Jesse
Pennington, the long-time left-back of West Bromwich Albion in the immediate
periods before and after the first world war. The 1912 FA Cup final between
Albion and Barnsley was a dire load of forgettable tosh: 120 minutes of
goalless rubbish at Crystal Palace, followed by another 117 goalless minutes in
the replay at Bramall Lane. Still, everyone had put a shift in, and nobody
wanted to lose. Then Barnsley winger George Utley slid a pass upfield to Harry
Tufnell, who broke clear from the halfway line. Pennington famously had the
chance to trip the player up – Corinthian values had long gone by the wayside,
even in 1912 – but opted instead to do the right thing, admitting defeat in his
personal duel and letting the victor race on. Tufnell slipped the ball past the
Albion keeper, Hubert Pearson, and into the bottom-left corner of the net, and
the cup was Barnsley's.
A year
later, Pennington – who blamed himself for Albion's defeat –took centre stage
in a betting scandal, agreeing to influence the outcome of a match, but only in
order to gather evidence for the police. As the robber bandit was sent down for
five months in the jug, thanks largely to Pennington's efforts, another feather
was wedged in the full-back's karmic cap. Pennington would not be rewarded with
an FA Cup, but he did go on to captain West Brom to their only league title, in
1919-20.
4.
Bill Tilden (1927 French Championships)
The
legendary US tennis player Big Bill Tilden was unquestionably the star of the
1920s. After reaching the 1918 and 1919 finals of the US National
Championships, he won his home title six years on the spin.
He would
likely have repeated this record at Wimbledon, too, but, after winning in SW19
in 1920 and 1921, did not bother to cross the Atlantic again, considering the
quality of the opposition outside the States second-rate. Which was a fair
enough assumption: a Tilden-led US team kept hold of the Davis Cup every year
between 1920 and 1926, handing out fearful thrashings to Australasia, Japan,
Australia and France during their reign.
But France
were on the up, and were about to knock the States off their perch. Thanks to
the Four Musketeers – Henri Cochet, René Lacoste, Jean Borotra and Jacques
Brugnon – the French won six Davis Cups in a row between 1927 and 1932. Tilden,
his cap doffed, decided it was time to give the French National Championship a
shot.
In truth,
Tilden was, by now, slightly over the hill at 34 years of age. Nevertheless, he
would have won the French title at his very first attempt had he not served up
one of the great acts of sportsmanship in the final against Lacoste. The match
went to a fifth and final set, though only because Tilden, when leading 2-1 in
sets, had agreed to give his opponent 30 minutes to recover from cramp, rather
than win by default. The final set was something of a classic, and Tilden served
for it, the match, and the championship at 9-8.
Whistling
an ace past Lacoste's lugs at match point, the French player made to advance
the net and shake the victorious Tilden's hand – but suddenly a late call came
from a linesman. The serve was out. The linesman, ironically, was another of
the Four Musketeers, Cochet – though there was never any claim by Tilden of
duplicity. Tilden would lose another Paris final – to Cochet, of all people –
in 1930. He would never win the title, turning professional, though he did pick
up a couple of French Pro Championships in the 30s.
5.
Jack Nicklaus (1969 Ryder Cup)
It's easy
to harp on about slipping standards – mainly because standards are slipping –
but let's be honest with ourselves, they were never that high in the first
place. Take the Ryder Cup. In 1991 at Kiawah Island, Seve Ballesteros developed
an unfortunate tickle in his throat that would regularly force him to splutter
during Chip Beck's backswing, while Corey Pavin spent the entire weekend
posturing preposterously in a Desert Storm baseball cap. Both acts registered a
full 11 on the bigbairnometer, though the needle sheared clean off eight years
later, when the USA team went prance-about across José MarÃa Olazábal's line,
in celebration of a trophy not yet quite won.
And yet
there's an argument that suggests the template for this nonsense was set back
in 1969, when Great Britain gave their opponents from across the briny a very
rare fright during the era of total American dominance. The USA had won all but
three stagings of the cup since its inauguration in 1927 – in 1929, 1933 and
1957 – but in 1969 the contest was, for once, predicted to be tight. "To
an ever-increasing extent," wrote Pat Ward-Thomas in this paper,
"American golfers are ceasing to appear as formidable, legendary figures.
Their efficiency is beyond question, but no longer are they invested with
magical skills denied to the British … It should be a memorable three days,
come what may."
It
certainly was. Ahead of what would be a nip-and-tuck battle, the British
captain, Eric Brown, set the tone by instructing his players not to look for
any opposition balls that might find their way into the rough. In the afternoon
fourballs on the second day, Brian Huggett raised Cain after Dave Hill tapped in
for a half, accusing the American of putting out of turn. The referee pleaded
for reason, but Huggett refused to accept the ruling, and the Americans
conceded the hole. Hill's companion Ken Still, "made remarks that the
crowd overheard and on the 8th green booing broke out". During the singles
on Saturday, Still deliberately stood too close to his opponent Maurice
Bembridge while the Brit was putting.
Thank the
golfing gods, then, for Jack Nicklaus, who in the final match of the final day
made the most famous concession in all sport.
With the
scores level at 15½ points each, Nicklaus and the newly crowned Open champion,
Tony Jacklin, went down the final hole all square. There would be little drama,
until the death: both men reached the green in regulation. Jacklin left himself
a two-foot tiddler for par, while Nicklaus knocked in a five-footer for his.
Nicklaus's
par meant the USA would escape with at least a draw, and retain the trophy no
matter what. But with his captain, Sam Snead, on the sidelines itching for the
outright win, Nicklaus picked up Jacklin's marker and conceded the putt. The
match was halved – and the 1969 Ryder Cup was drawn. "I don't think you
would have missed that, Tony," Nicklaus said, "but I didn't want to
give you the chance."
One of the
great moments of sportsmanship. Which shines like a beacon to this day, despite
– or perhaps because – it was swiftly followed by an irate Snead giving his
star man pelters in a full and frank exchange of views.
6.
Alf Gover (1945 Victory Test)
The Victory
Test series of 1945 between England and Australian Services was always destined
to become a feelgood story for the ages, whatever happened. The first match was
held 12 days after the unconditional surrender of Germany, and crowds flocked
to Lord's partly to witness the first such action in six years, partly to get
back into the groove of normal life. The four three-day matches weren't awarded
official Test status – the Aussies had to scrape together an inexperienced
team, while England were close to full strength – but nobody paid much
attention to the bureaucracy. This was a welcome return to the sort of combat
that could be enjoyed.
"The
MCC hope always to maintain the great tradition of a game which means so much
to both England and Australia," the MCC president, Stanley Christopherson,
wrote, during an exchange of cablegrams with the Australian prime minister,
John Curtin. "We reciprocate warmly your wish that never again will the
matches be interrupted." The nice war was back on.
The series
would end all square, two "Tests" apiece, but it was apt that the
opening match would be the most memorable. On the opening day, in cold weather,
England made a first-innings total of 267 in front of a Lord's crowd of 23,000.
By stumps, Australia had put on 82 for the loss of two wickets.
Day two,
on the Monday, saw Australia take control of the match as, under perfect
batting conditions, they rattled up a first-innings total of 455.
"England's somewhat elderly team toiled in vain to stop the young
Australian airmen and soldiers," the Manchester Guardian reported.
"The truth is that England has had no opportunity yet to replace Hedley
Verity and Ken Farnes, both killed during the war, or WE Bowes, who only
recently returned from a German prison camp."
Australia's
big score that day was made by "night-fighter pilot Keith Miller",
who notched a 105 "notable for vigorous drives and cuts". The crowd,
as nonpartisan as it gets between England and Australia, simply enjoyed the
spectacle. "They welcomed the former prisoner of war, Graham Williams, by
cheering him all the way to the crease. He too, enjoyed himself … helping
himself to eleven fours in his 53."
England
ended the day requiring 188 to avoid an innings defeat.
Which they
managed, setting Australia a target of 107 to win in their final innings. They
had 70 minutes to score them. For a while, it looked as if the Aussie XI would
fail to make it; with 20 minutes of play left, they were 65 for three. But
England's bowlers began to flag and Australia inched towards their target. Just
as the clock was about to strike seven, to end the day's play, Australia were
still five runs short. At which point England bowler Alf Gover ordered his
team-mates to rush to their positions to ensure their opponents had one last
over, and a chance to register a deserved victory. Which they did, Cec Pepper
sweeping to leg for two. The previous ball, also hit for two runs by Pepper,
was nearly caught, a draw slipping through the Englishman's fingers. But let's
not think how close this fairy story came to remaining untold.
Labels:
media,
observations
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















![Validate my Atom 1.0 feed [Valid Atom 1.0]](valid-atom.png)
