Monday, June 29, 2009

logging miles in the hot sun (training notes 06-29-09)

i have not been on a bike since Ironman New Zealand 2008. which means i literally have not mounted the saddle and shoes, pulled on the helmet and gloves, or even touched the frame and chain in the space of the last 16 months.

bad, i know, especially considering that i'm supposedly doing Ironman Utah 2010.

while i have been keeping up a schedule of running, swimming, and general physical activity, i'm pretty sure that nothing i've been doing is anywhere near sufficient for any hopes of a break-through performance next year...or anytime in the near future.

with this in mind, i made a conscious commitment this past Sunday (yesterday) to doing a dedicated bike ride in the morning, and follow it up with a decent run in the evening. given my current fitness level, and the fact that i was coming off a vacation of zero (well, apart from some mountain hiking, zero) physical exertion, i decided to keep with what i thought to be some moderate numbers: 42 miles on the bike and 6 miles on the run.

uh, well...that was a bit of an underestimation on my part.

what i'd taken to be moderate actually turned out to be a bit of an effort.

it was pretty much all i could do to just keep up a constant 16 mph on the bike to stay with my riding buddy (who i ended up relying on to pace me). my legs did not feel comfortable (a little bit more tense than i'd expected). nor, for that matter, did the bike (pretty much training wheels time all over again in terms of handling skills). and my butt felt like it had taken a horse-kick straight to the tail (i was so sore i could barely sit straight in the saddle).

yeah, it was hot and i was short on water, with temps in the 90s and me with just 1 bottle. but i don't take that as an excuse. based on how i felt, my conditioning on the bike is just pathetic.

the best way i can describe it is to paraphrase the song:
logging miles in the hot sun
i fought the law and the law won
incidentally, this was the soundtrack in my head pulling me through this ride...especially the opening lines of the original (i'll show the version by the Clash):

The Clash, I Fought the Law
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16u0wwCfoJ4


oh, i made the ride fine. that's not the issue. the issue(s) is(are):
  1. this time last year this would have been an easy ride. as in laughable.
  2. i was expending too much effort muscle-wise to be going at just 16 mph. just too much.
  3. i was not comfortable in the cockpit. even going straight. and i don't think i could have stayed in it much beyond the ride we covered.
  4. i'm going to need to be doing a whole lot more in about 10 months.
i take comfort in the fact that it was the 1st ride in a looooooooong time, that i'm essentially starting a base-building phase, making the speed and distance consistent with the training schedule, and the handling skills and cockpit comfort should come with time...and i do have some time.

but i was so disconcerted after the ride that i actually looked forward to the afternoon run--essentially an opportunity to redeem myself and restore my bruised psyche. of course, the run wasn't entirely comfortable, given the heat, and i had to walk a good number of times to address hydration issues. but it went a whole lot better than the bike ride.

i think i'm just going to have to log miles. when it comes to training, especially on the bike, there's just no way around it. i have to log miles. i've heard pros and coaches say this consistently, and i consider it very much true...not just because it conditions physical output and builds performance, but also because it acclimates your comfort level with an environment that you have to deal with for extended periods of time (hours upon hours). and over the course of an Ironman, the comfort level ends up being crucial to output and performance.

i'm just going to have to commit to logging miles.

starting (literally) from yesterday.

Friday, June 26, 2009

core v. abs

i'm sure a lot of you have been doing a lot of core work. it seems to be a pretty big trend, with just about every workout and training regime that i see devoting at least some part of the schedule to it. it's at the point that if you're not doing core work, you probably feel like you're missing out.

i've fallen prey to this wave myself, catching it courtesy of the advice of some physical therapists, various coaches, and a few of my friends who've all sworn by it, and asserted that it would help address some major issues of mine (chronically bad lower back, chronically sore connective tissues from the erector spinae to the gluteus to the hamstrings and upper calves, and overall poor posture). i've managed to get results, so i'm pretty much signed on to the movement.

problem is, one of the things i've learned is that 1) not many people seem to agree on what the "core" is, and 2) not many people seem to know what are truly good core exercises. as a result, i suspect a lot of them are doing random exercises they've seen without any understanding as to what they're doing--or if they should be done at all.

there was an article in the New York Times recently that gets to this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/21/magazine/21FOB-physed-t.html?_r=1

i put the full text of the article at the bottom of this post.

the article pretty much asserts what i'm saying: a lot of people talking about the core, but then doing exercises that don't really reflect this. if anything, people are doing exercises that just focus on the abs, with a fixation on the visible front portion of their midsections (i.e., the 6-pack/8-pack territory...the kind you use to show off your fitness and general sexiness). thing is, this is only 1 part of the core, and ignores your obliques, your sides, the back portion of the core, and (as emphasized in this article) all the underlying deep muscles.

based on what my physical therapists, coaches, and friends have told me, the reason all this is important from a sports perspective is that your body requires some measure of stability, and that hence this stability must come from somewhere. ideally, your supporting muscle groups serve to provide the stability and your major muscle groups are free to concentrate on providing the propulsion for larger movements (e.g., swimming, biking, running, etc.). for a lot of athletes, however, the supporting muscle groups are underdeveloped, forcing the major muscle groups to devote a portion of their effort to providing stability, resulting in less output to driving larger movements.

in essence, it's comparable to the inefficiencies of an engine. the lack of stability has a similar effect to the presence of internal friction in an engine: it robs you of power.

which makes it worthwhile to take some time work on the internal portion of your body and improve stability, so that you can maximize efficiency and improve power output.

this means that you have work on the core...and not just the abs, but the entire core. the real one.

Core Myths
By GRETCHEN REYNOLDS
New York Times
June 21, 2009
Phys Ed

The genesis of much of the ab work we do these days probably lies in the work done in an Australian physiotherapy lab during the mid-1990s. Researchers there, hoping to elucidate the underlying cause of back pain, attached electrodes to people’s midsections and directed them to rapidly raise and lower their arms, like the alarmist robot in “Lost in Space.” In those with healthy backs, the scientists found, a deep abdominal muscle tensed several milliseconds before the arms rose. The brain apparently alerted the muscle, the transversus abdominis, to brace the spine in advance of movement. In those with back pain, however, the transversus abdominis didn’t fire early. The spine wasn’t ready for the flailing. It wobbled and ached. Perhaps, the researchers theorized, increasing abdominal strength could ease back pain. The lab worked with patients in pain to isolate and strengthen that particular deep muscle, in part by sucking in their guts during exercises. The results, though mixed, showed some promise against sore backs.

From that highly technical foray into rehabilitative medicine, a booming industry of fitness classes was born. “The idea leaked” into gyms and Pilates classes that core health was “all about the transversus abdominis,” Thomas Nesser, an associate professor of physical education at Indiana State University who has studied core fitness, told me recently. Personal trainers began directing clients to pull in their belly buttons during crunches on Swiss balls or to press their backs against the floor during sit-ups, deeply hollowing their stomachs, then curl up one spinal segment at a time. “People are now spending hours trying to strengthen” their deep ab muscles, Nesser said.

But there’s growing dissent among sports scientists about whether all of this attention to the deep abdominal muscles actually gives you a more powerful core and a stronger back and whether it’s even safe. A provocative article published in the The British Journal of Sports Medicine last year asserted that some of the key findings from the first Australian study of back pain might be wrong. Moreover, even if they were true for some people in pain, the results might not apply to the generally healthy and fit, whose trunk muscles weren’t misfiring in the first place.

“There’s so much mythology out there about the core,” maintains Stuart McGill, a highly regarded professor of spine biomechanics at the University of Waterloo in Canada and a back-pain clinician who has been crusading against ab exercises that require hollowing your belly. “The idea has reached trainers and through them the public that the core means only the abs. There’s no science behind that idea.”

The “core” remains a somewhat nebulous concept; but most researchers consider it the corset of muscles and connective tissue that encircle and hold the spine in place. If your core is stable, your spine remains upright while your body swivels around it. But, McGill says, the muscles forming the core must be balanced to allow the spine to bear large loads. If you concentrate on strengthening only one set of muscles within the core, you can destabilize your spine by pulling it out of alignment. Think of the spine as a fishing rod supported by muscular guy wires. If all of the wires are tensed equally, the rod stays straight. “If you pull the wires closer to the spine,” McGill says, as you do when you pull in your stomach while trying to isolate the transversus abdominis, “what happens?” The rod buckles. So, too, he said, can your spine if you overly focus on the deep abdominal muscles. “In research at our lab,” he went on to say, “the amount of load that the spine can bear without injury was greatly reduced when subjects pulled in their belly buttons” during crunches and other exercises.

Instead, he suggests, a core exercise program should emphasize all of the major muscles that girdle the spine, including but not concentrating on the abs. Side plank (lie on your side and raise your upper body) and the “bird dog” (in which, from all fours, you raise an alternate arm and leg) exercise the important muscles embedded along the back and sides of the core. As for the abdominals, no sit-ups, McGill said; they place devastating loads on the disks. An approved crunch begins with you lying down, one knee bent, and hands positioned beneath your lower back for support. “Do not hollow your stomach or press your back against the floor,” McGill says. Gently lift your head and shoulders, hold briefly and relax back down. These three exercises, done regularly, McGill said, can provide well-rounded, thorough core stability. And they avoid the pitfalls of the all-abs core routine. “I see too many people,” McGill told me with a sigh, “who have six-pack abs and a ruined back.”

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

a vacation and a return

as some of you have told me, i haven't posted anything here for awhile.

my deepest apologies. i know some of you have become regular readers, and i know that my audience extended to an international readership. and i suspect that i may have lost a few followers.

there's some reasons for this. i took a bit of a break, accompanied by a brief vacation. in part unwanted, but in part wanted. but all of it very much needed. and this required that i close off access to this blog for a while.

i won't go into details, since it involves some personal things that i suspect would either bore you or not impress you. suffice it to say that i wasn't entirely happy, and was deeply disappointed and profoundly disturbed by some events in my life. things have been resolved--not entirely, but to a degree that i can move on.

but i'm back now, and people are free to read this blog once again.

so welcome, and i hope you can all find your way to joining me once again.

Saturday, May 09, 2009

picking up the pieces

we've all been broken. physically, mentally, even spiritually. by people, events, things. in ways sometimes accidental or intentional, but always invariably brutal.

and sometimes it's left us in pieces so many, so great, so random and in such chaos, that it seems there's nothing left of us still recognizable--nothing left to continue, nothing left to begin, nothing to even make whole again. instead there's only shards, marking what might have been now shattered and strewn remorselessly across the earth in the stillness that is the meaning of loss and the silence that is the truth of trauma.

we've all been broken. and in ways we know we'll never recover.

and the worst of it was not the breaking...because it's never just about the breaking.

the worst is what comes after.

what do you do with the pieces of a broken life? a broken heart? a broken dream?

what do you do when you're left as nothing more than litter lying amongst the filth of the ground?

the temptation is to surrender. to let the pieces lie where they are. to let the remnants now become fragments of who and what and when and why turn into empty memories of that which once was of us but now forever cannot be. to just let go. and be broken.

but then you realize several very simple but very important, very crucial things:
  1. whoever whatever where-ever whenever it was that broke you does not care about you, but if you stay where you are as you are in time you are, it will have accomplished its goal. and that was to destroy life. yours. and you can't allow that because
  2. if you do nothing, if you give up, then you'll never experience the things that you were meant to experience, or learn the things you were meant to learn, or to live the life you were supposed to live. and you'll never come to know that which is the truth of you. and more importantly come to know that
  3. life is special. it's a gift. it's a miracle it's a mystery it's a divine sublime supreme enigma from the nothingness that is the universe. don't waste it.
all this leads you to one result: to do all the above--any of the above--you have to go your distance. you have to run your race. you have to live.

and to do this, you have to do the one thing of all things if anything if nothing else that is the truth of life: movement.

because life is the motion that rises above stillness and reifies from emptiness and sings in the stillness and makes the body and mind and soul that is the something more than nothing that is the truth of the universe.

life is life itself.

and so you reach out. for the pieces of yourself that lie nearest within your grasp. beginning with one, and then another, and then another. perhaps with the smallest first, being they're the easiest to reach, then onto the largest, because they're the most important to understand.

and you'll pause for a moment with each one, to ponder and think and reflect and recall or even relive the memories held within it, and reassess and re-evaluate what it means, and then thereby restore it to its rightful place within your heart.

and then you'll continue, until you've collected them all, or have as many as you need, and can see once more a vision that lets you see the truth of life and living that is the universe and you, and somehow someway somewhere sometime find a way for yourself once more to begin anew again.

can we re-assemble the pieces to resemble anything like we were? can we re-create anything even close? can we return to what was once before?

no. of course not. things do not work that way.

but then, you don't want them to.

because the trace of your life follows an unknown path leading to an unseen destination lying in an untouched land lying beside an unending horizon. and to get there you must proceed from here. and that means moving forward.

and to do that, you don't need to the pieces to be about once was or might have been. you just need them to be about what they are...and what they will be.

you need them to be you.

Wednesday, May 06, 2009

velo-city 2009

so why don't we in the U.S. have something like this?
Velo-City 2009 is an international conference (well, actually, just in Europe) held annually (this year it will be May 12-15 in Brussels, Belgium) to encourage bicycles and cycling as an alternative mode of transportation in urban areas, with the goal of providing a forum for cycling enthusiasts to meet as well as hosting a conference enabling cities to develop better cycling-friendly policies.

sounds pretty good to me.

now again, why isn't there anything like this in the U.S.?

cycling-related fatalities keep rising in the U.S., with an alarming escalation in hostile driver-cyclist encounters. and the cycling conditions in most U.S. cities (particularly here in Los Angeles) are NOT bicycle-friendly, no matter how much local governments claim it is. seriously, i sometimes have to laugh when i see the streets L.A. city government has identified as "bike-friendly." half the time they're pothole-laden, filth-ridden, high-traffic, high-speed, high-tension death lanes only usable by the foolhardy or the courageous--something entirely contrary to any plans of promoting bicycles as a safe, eco-friendly, traffic-easing, enjoyable form of transportation.

for some relevant links regarding the state of urban cycling in America, check out the following sample:
the closest thing i've found to Velo-City in the U.S. is National Bike-to-Work Week (incidentally, May 11-15, reference: League of American Bicyclists) and National Bike Month (May). but this is just meant to promote cycling, and doesn't provide the additional step of hosting public officials to actually meet and work on improving cycling policies in their cities.

there are also organizations that attempt to motivate public pressure on government regarding cycling-related policies. Los Angeles, in particular, has the Los Angeles County Bike Coalition (LA-Bike.org). but again, it doesn't provide what Velo-City does, which is provide a location where multiple city governments can work together to establish common policies to improve cycling conditions.

the reason i think this is important is because i think part of the problem in the U.S. is that cycling-friendly supporters are operating in a fragmented pattern, with disjunctures in agendas and strategies targeted at a random array of objectives in disconnected locations. the result has been a watering down of energy, commitment, and awareness, and a suppression of whatever momentum potentially exists to create substantial, permanent, beneficial change. i think greater coordination (by both non-government and government supporters) would provide better support, greater resources, more energy, more commitment, more awareness that could better advance cycling-friendly agendas and strategies...which is exactly what Velo-City is doing.

so...

if anybody out there (Los Angeles, U.S., Europe, wherever) is considering on starting Velo-City (or anything like it) in the U.S., let me know. because i'd certainly want to go, and because i think it would really help improve cycling conditions in this country.

Monday, April 27, 2009

the undiscovered country

prologue note: the following is a speech that i give to students in every class i teach. it's a life-lessons talk meant to help them see just how education (theirs, and humanity's in general) fits in with the nature of life and living. while ostensibly meant more to deal with school and the process of school, i think the principles extend to include other aspects of life, like art or athletics. because whether student or artist or athlete or human being, the process and principle and purpose is the same: education, and the more universal implications that arise from it...like the expansion and development of who we are--in our minds as well as our bodies and ultimately our souls.

fundamentally, we are creatures of curiousity. we cannot be content to just simply live. confronted by the eternity that is the universe, we find ourselves before the enormity of all existence, and are driven to an existentialist state calling for us to find our place within it. in the face of the enigma so mysterious, so profound, so sacred, so supreme, we are moved, because we realize all of that which lies without us also lies within us, and that it and we and all of this is really just the same...and so that to look upon the unknown is to look upon ourselves, our world, this cosmos, and even the reaches of creation that lie beyond, and come to know its face and see its nature and understand it to be its our this one soul.

except there's one slight problem: the universe is infinite. the phenomena within it are infinite. in number and in complexity. and we, unfortunately, are not. we are finite, with limited bodies, limited senses, and limited minds constrained within limited life spans. as a result, there's only so much we can take in, only so much we can ingest, only so much we can understand, and only so much time for us to do so.

the best we can do--and the only thing that has ever been done--is that each of us endeavors to understand as much as we can as well as we can as fast as we can, and pass on our understanding as knowledge to those who come after us, so that the gradual passage of the generations of our species accumulates a store of collective wisdom about that which we call existence. like a painting of the pointilist movement, we individually each bring our own spot of color and lay it upon the canvas of our comprehension, and over time the spots gather and grow and manifest a larger picture that in total comes to form the image of our understanding of the universe.

such an analogy, however, is a disservice to the divine. it lacks the scale of the sacred. and hence profanes that which is most assuredly profound.

rather, the better picture--the greater image--is perhaps this:

the universe can be seen as a vast unknown, unexplored, untouched, undiscovered country, lying in the halo of dawn's horizon, reaching forth to the frontiers of eternity, unfolding great and gleaming and glorious and glittering in the glow that is god's creation...and it beckons us to learn its mysteries.

but we don't know this country. there are no trails. nor markers. nor guides. nor even any maps. at best, all we have are the barest scraps of outlines on paper marking trails traced by explorers who have traveled ever so bravely before us. and the records of their journeys have been compiled slowly, carefully, painstakingly, one by one, as each of them sought to venture a little farther than those who came before and dared to expand the confines of our known world before they took their final journeys past. so that their stories became our stories, and our stories grew to become the scriptures of our souls.

and the stories continue with you.

you see, the early years of personal development--first preschool, then primary school, then secondary school--are largely about learning how to read the map. to see just what the symbols mean, and just how they relate to what we know, and just what direction corresponds to what location how and why and when and where.

the next phase of growth builds upon this, with undergraduate years serving to fill content of the map, so that it identifies certain schools of thought laid out in certain locations, and certain scholars clustered in certain communities, and certain lines of reasoning that lead along certain paths to certain destinations.

for most people, education can end with this. for the majority, it does. people graduate from college with the tools to live within the known world. it is entirely possible for them to live their entire lives within the confines of the map and be entirely happy. and it is entirely possible to live a complete and fulfilling life by remaining entirely within the borders of our understanding.

but...

have you ever wondered what lay beyond the borders of the map?

have you ever wondered what lay beyond the reaches of that which is already known?

have you ever wondered what lay out there--far out there--in the vast, great, undiscovered country?

that's where the next stage of development comes in. it's in graduate school where you learn the borders of the map, where you learn what is known (in some ways, a fair amount) versus what is not known (in all ways, absolutely everything). more importantly, however, it's where you are taught the ways in which we venture forth into the unknown, the tools and methods and instincts and reasoning we use to navigate our way through the uncharted lands. it's where you are taught how to explore the unexplored.

this means that professors, researchers, scholars, all those engaged in the great endeavor of education--theirs ours everyone's--are really all explorers. each one. setting out to explore the unexplored, so that they can learn what lies beyond. out there, far out there, in the undiscovered country.

you may wonder as to that term.

this is yet one more example of how a whole lot more can be learned about life from art than it ever could be learned from science. the words are from Shakespeare's Hamlet. it's found in Act III, Scene I, in the famous soliloquoy of Hamlet, where he muses over "to be, or not to be, that is the question..." the passage itself reads "...the undiscovered country, from whose bourne no traveler has ever returned..."

for most readers, "the undiscovered country" is typically interpreted as death. but in a way, it's really about mystery, about anything that is unknown, and so the analogy still holds as to it representing the enigma that is this existence, and the epicenter of all our efforts to understand its truths.

the difference, however, is that we hold the hope that all travelers to the undiscovered country shall return, and bring back to us what they have found and record for us what they have learned and add with us what they have seen to the borders of our map, so that even as we are confronted by the eternity that is the universe and the enormity that is existence and the enigma that is so mysterious, so profound, so sacred, so supreme, we can look upon the unknown and see that we look upon ourselves, our world, this cosmos, and even the reaches of creation that lie beyond, and can come to know its face and see its nature and understand it to be its our this one soul.

and in so doing, come a little closer to divine majesty. a little closer to holy sanctity. a little closer to the presence of an almighty god.

epilogue note: you get it, don't you? the distinction between high school, bachelor's degree, graduate degree or amateur, elite, professional artist or athlete doesn't matter. it doesn't even matter if it's student, artist, athlete, or anything else at all. ultimately, the distinction is really about becoming the best human being you can be...about acquiring the skills and having the motivation to become an explorer, to pursue the adventure, to venture forth into the vast, great, undiscovered country that lies before us and beckons us to learn its mysteries. all of them.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

earth day 2009: race day recycling

well, it's Earth Day 2009, Wednesday, April 22, and so time for another eco-friendly blog post.

i've written Earth Day-related posts before, addressing what i thought was a significant--but entirely fixable--problem in sports: race day trash. particularly at triathlons and marathons, which have gained outsized proportions courtesy of their accessibility to the masses. you can reference my previous comments at the following:
i want to do things a little differently this year. while keeping things on the topic of race-generated trash, i wanted to take things a bit further and go beyond just simply advocating to keep races clean, but to also keep races green. in particular, i want to now encourage people to do more than just clean up race-day trash, but to take one more step and look to recycle it.

in the previous posts, i encouraged everyone (race organizers, race spectators, and race participants) to pick up their trash (gel wraps, energy drinks, sunscreen bottles, chapstick flasks, tissues, band-aids, etc.) and deposit it in appropriate garbage receptacles. while this goes a long way to keeping things clean, it doesn't really fix the issue of garbage.

here's why: trash doesn't stop at the garbage bin. simply having everyone dump their trash into confined receptacles on race day doesn't eliminate the waste; all it does it enable the collection of it. at some point (invariably after the race is over), the garbage bins are subjected to the usual government processes used to carry out the regular public waste management policies.

unfortunately, at least in the United States (and i'm too afraid to ask about elsewhere), "regular waste management policies" most likely means dumping trash straight into a landfill.

in essence, simply being content to put race day trash into a garbage bin is really nothing more than an act to make it someone else's problem--except that it's not someone else's problem, but ours.

you see, there's only so much space in landfills, and only so many landfills to go around, and only so much filth and contaminants and poisons and toxins that landfills can contain...and there is no end of trash. in fact, the rate of trash production is growing. meaning that we all (collectively, and ultimately individually), sooner or later, have to confront the garbage problem.

the stats are pretty sobering. a cursory review of various internet sources shows that in 2007 the U.S. produced more than 254 million tons of household trash, with over 137 million tons going to landfills and only 63.3 million tons being recycled. despite efforts to decrease per capita waste production, this country still experienced a 60% increase (!!!) in municipal waste between 1980 and 2005. you can check it out for yourself, starting with the following useful sources:
and the thing is, the trash, no matter how much of it we think goes to landfills, still invariably manages to find itself into the natural world, where it continues to accumulate and generate untold damage to the environment...where we, as people, as a society, as a species, have to live. and it's kind of problematic to do that when the ecosystem you're relying on to sustain you is being choked by your trash.

if you want an idea of just how much of our trash leaches out into the natural world (despite the use of landfills), and just where it all ends up, and just what it's doing, check out this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLrVCI4N67M

i should note that this is something i see every time i go swimming or surfing after a rainstorm off the Los Angeles shoreline. even though it's only a small scale of what is shown in the above video, what i see is still enough to be absolutely shocking. which is why i've become so sensitive about this issue--once you find yourself adrift in this stuff, and realize just what is in it, you don't ever want to do anything to contribute to the problem again.

which is why i'd like to encourage all races to try and facilitate recycling as much as possible, to reduce not just the trash we see littering the race course, but to actually reduce the trash being generated overall from the race event itself. triathlon, marathon, whatever. any race. every race.

to a degree, it's already being done, and there has been a growing movement towards this. i found some laudable examples:
this is a very good start, and certainly very promising. thing is, i'm worried that it's not prevalent enough.

in particular, i'm not so sure that Ironman events are on the recycling bandwagon yet--and if there's any event that generates trash, Ironman is it. drawing lessons from the above list of races, i'd really like to see every Ironman try to do more to implement recycling efforts by trying any of the following (or anything else in addition to the following):
  • goody bags: get rid of them. and all the random pieces of paper inside them. it all gets thrown away by most race participants anyway. if advertising is the issue, then it should be just as easy to e-mail the ads to race entrees and thereby save trees and stop plastic from intruding any further into our world. and as for all the goodies inside the goody bags, just have them available for people to pick up by hand when they register--or at the very least, use recyclable bags to hold them.
  • recycle bins: big ones. really big ones. on the side of the road at every aid station. something the size of pickup trucks (or mac trucks), with 1 truck labeled "plastic" and another labeled "paper" and maybe another labeled "metal." that way people who are running or cycling by can easily self-sort and toss their trash as they go by--with targets that big, it verges on asking racers to hit the broad side of a barn, which is something anybody can do at any speed...or at least, i'd certainly hope (including even the pros?).
  • pre-race instructions: oh god yes. i think we under-estimate the human willingness to do good things. i think that if race organizers included announcements at registration, the athlete tents, the merchandise shops, the pre-race events, and above all, the pre-race dinner, all containing brief instructions on what race participants need to do to help control race day trash, it would go a long way to creating a self-correcting mechanism on race day. that, and i think it would generate enough response that there would be a reservoir of peer pressure among competitors to be conscientious in dealing with their own trash on race day.
incidentally, i have to admit, i have seen some of this at 1 Ironman: Ironman New Zealand. which is where i got some of these ideas--i'll never forget Didymo Dave (just ask the race organizers), and i'll never forget the 3-meter-high by 3-meter-wide tarp target with a big red bulls-eye painted on it that said "throw trash here" (which almost every competitor did). thank god for New Zealand. now we just need to do it for every Ironman...especially in these freakin' United States.

thankfully, i think American triathletes are starting to generate a grass-roots movement for greener triathlons on their own. you can check out the following:
it's very satisfying. but i just want to see it translate into results, with everyone (race organizers, race spectators, and race competitors) making concerted efforts to recycle. i know i sound like an uptight anal-retentive eco-nut with all this, but it just horrifies me to see just how much trash is being produced at all the races i see--it's something i just don't want to associate with events that i see as being expressions of the greater ideals of human endeavor. it (trash) is just not what we should be about.

so here's to race day recycling. and from one athlete to many others: let's make our races not only clean, but also green.